Richard Dawkins is a Coward Who Refuses to Debate William Lane Craig

Download this video:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6ZFYN53M (birdieupon who made this video encourages people to download it!)

This video (made by youtube.com/birdieupon) shows Richard Dawkins and his hypocrisy for not debating William Lane Craig despite his saying he is open to debate.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Richard
• Dawkins
• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Debate
• UK
• Tour
• 2011
• God
• Delusion
• Atheist
• New
• Atheism
• Apologetics
• Science
• Religion
• Philosophy
• Christopher
• Hitchens
• Sam
• Harris
• Daniel
• Dennett
• Lewis
• Wolpert
• Atheists
• Bright
• Christianit
• Christian

[Galmozzi99]

Dawkins only succeeds against straw-men. While I would enjoy watching him self destruct against WLC, this running away is kinda funny. Too many you tube atheists think pointless 500 character comment debates solve anything but see no need for Dawkins to debate WLC. That's funny too.

[sonofthunder79]

@rqm797 Thank you so much for the science lesson, but that wasn't the question I asked, so I will ask again. Given your premise, that matter has always existed, how did all of the specifically complex life we see before us, arise? There are only two possible options. Was it matter+time+energy= life? Or does it make more sense to say that there was/is some kind of intelligence behind it all? In the beginning God? OR, In the beginning, dirt?

[indianslummer]

If Dawkins doesn't feel comfortable or 'see the point' in debating with the worlds most Renowned Professional christian theologians/debaters then he simply should not be writing books in that territory.

[BleuPoulp]

I don't understand how Dawkins' refusal to debate with WLC is supposed to be a valid argument for creationism.

[RichardBawkBawkins]

Who's calling me a coward? How dare they.

[JCrownwell]

@WeAreSektor

"Dawkins is not a coward"

It's his fellow ATHEISTS who are most vociferous of his cowardice.

Google: "richard dawkins refusal to debate is cynical and anti-intellectualist" (Daniel Came) and "Richard Dawkins is either a fool or a coward for refusing to debate William Lane Craig" (Tim Stanley).

In other words, if you want to address the accusations of cowardice directed at Dawkins, you can start by addressing the atheist camp first. :)

[kleykenb]

@Galmozzi99

WLC is a joke. All he does is cash in on scared religious folk. Folk scared of a world without a God. The process is simple really : paint a world without God as a world without morals, without purpose and without objective good and evil and most religious folk will avert their eyes as they prefer the ultimate bliss the Bible claims there to be at the end of the rainbow. Craig knowns only this deceit and you're the cash cow he likes to milk. Bought his book yet ?!

[kleykenb]

@JCrownwell

Hardly. The debate Dawkins vs Lennox you find on youtube is a deceit. It was edited severely.Basically they removed much of Dawkin's replies to Lennox to give the impression that he had no answers at all. Best to listen to the interview on Richard Dawkins Foundation's website in it's entirety. Creationists seem to have been called to arms and youtube is now filled with Creationist deceit. Faul play is definitely something relished by these fundamentalists. As is violence.

[WeAreSektor]

Dawkins is not a coward, but a wise man who uses pure evidence to back up the claims he is making. For going to the bible to back up a claim, is a joke.

We Are Sektor, We Are One, And We Are Science

[JCrownwell]

@KevZen2000

The rumour is that it was the lambasting he received in his debate with Lennox that led to Dawkins refusing further debates on theism.