Phelim McAleer talks Global Warming in the Snow

http://www.climatechangereconsidered.org/
http://www.co2science.org/
http://climaterealists.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/co2science
http://www.youtube.com/user/noteviljustwrong
http://www.youtube.com/user/GlobalStewardship

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Global
• Climate
• Warming
• Change
• Concern
• Fraud
• Tempurature
• Government
• Monckton
• Phelim
• McAleer
• Richard
• Lindzen
• Al
• Gore
• UN
• IPCC
• Copenhagen
• Barrack
• Obama
• Fred
• Singer
• NIPCC
• Nongovernmental
• International
• Panel

[klaudius2005]

@fusedchromosome right...still a hoax

cold snaps??? and snowstorms??? are stupid arguments???

the real arguments would be constant freezing temperatures throughout the entire summer???yeah maybe then you will realize the "reality" of "Global warming" ==))))))

[fusedchromosome]

@klaudius2005

"Still on the "you need to read more" thing??? Get over it senor!"

Don't know what else to say except "you do need to read more" because your "facts" don't "speak for themselves." There's more to the problem that you can't seem to grasp. Watch some videos by Richard Lindzen (MIT Professor). He doesn't agree that AGW is a problem but at least he uses real arguments and not stupid shit like snowstorms and isolated cold snaps.

No need to respond, this is getting old.

[klaudius2005]

@fusedchromosome Still on the "you need to read more" thing??? Get over it senor! You may be surprised that I have read a lot and that I have acquired some knowledge on the issue. So, please be so kind and drop this second-hand pitiful line. Again, I have no arguments (is it clear now?), I only have facts, and another fact to the matter at hand is that there are cold temperatures in India...and that speaks for itself.

[fusedchromosome]

@klaudius2005

"in Australia is summer time, and it is snowing...."

As if what it's doing in one part of the world tells the story. Your arguments aren't getting any better.

"... it may be challenging for some people."

That is very funny considering it is obvious that there's a wealth of information you haven't studied that will demonstrate who's "challenged." Please don't take my word for it. Do more research. Even if you still don't accept AGW, at least your arguments will get better.

[fusedchromosome]

@klaudius2005

"Did you investigate the "Wegman Report?" It's a prime example of how the fossil fuel industry and their pet politicians are peddling disinformation and doing whatever they can to spread doubt. They're pulling all the same tricks that the tobacco industry did (basically the same playbook.) They will do whatever it takes to maximize "doubt." They were also vilifying scientists back then but it's obvious now who was lying and it wasn't scientists.

[fusedchromosome]

@klaudius2005

" I am entitled to have an opinion."

Absolutely. I never said you weren't. I'm not one of those people who tells others to shut up. But, if you choose to share that opinion, you should be prepared to have it challenged. Any "opinion" I toss into the debate is open to criticism by anyone. I have no problem with that whatsoever. Everyone can learn something by having their "opinion" challenged (unless learning isn't a priority.) Getting corrected makes me study more.

[klaudius2005]

Respond to this video...Again, senor, please do understand that I am NOT a scientist and I do NOT hold the truth. It is only my opinion and I do not want to deliver "punch" statements.

Please forgive my...intrepidity...to utter my own opinion. I do hold some knowledge on the issue and I think like any other ordinary tax paying citizen, I am entitled to have an opinion.

Have a good day.

[klaudius2005]

@fusedchromosome

lucky for me and for the world that you are around

thank You, Your Highness, for your good will of sharing your wisdom with us, common people.

in the same train of thoughts, please be advised that at this time (December 2010) in Australia is summer time, and it is snowing (just watch the news - Note: it requires the use of a tv or internet browsing, it may be challenging for some people). Tip: search the Associated Press website for the article

[fusedchromosome]

@klaudius2005

"It is just a scam, a hoax...nothing more."

Coming from someone who doesn't even bother to understand the basic arguments (for OR against), that statement is meaningless but certainly qualifies as "your point of view." Of course there couldn't possibly be anyone with financial interests who would do whatever it takes to discredit the science. If you want an example of a scam, try researching the history of the "Wegman Report." Note, it will require the use of a brain.

[fusedchromosome]

@klaudius2005

"of course that is your point of view."

Well, the vast scientific knowledge that you've demonstrated so far really adds some "punch" to that statement.