Roseanne Barr Clarifies 'Off With Their Heads' Statement 1/2
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (477)
-
@Aurinkohirvi Fair enough and I agree companies who continue to pay huge bonuses/salaries after receiving tax payer bailouts is disgusting and they should go to jail. But if we're rising a rebellion against the 100 million tax paying CEO we should maybe consider rising a rebellion against someone who prints and spends 100 billion of our money. 100 million is a drop in the bucket and that's how we're being blinded in OWS. If OWS is actually about socialism then why the smoke screens?
-
I did agree to behead them bankers. Yeah. After trial. They have killed millions, and hundreds of millions live in poverty because of them. They deserve that! Many times! Beheading isn't punishment enough for that.
-
I didn't agree with the beheading things. I named above what I agreed with. And I think it is simply ridiculous a CEO gets hundreds of times more income than a worker in the same company. That's not defendable, not right. That's my opinion. I agree on rising into rebellion against that if it's not changed.
-
@Aurinkohirvi Which CEO's exactly should get beheaded? Here are some actual facts to consider which may change your sentiment; The U.S. tax revenue is - $2,170,000,000,000 (google who's actually coughing this up). The Fed budget is - $3,280,000,000,000. New Gov't debt - $1,650,000,000,000 and the GRAND total U.S. National Debt is $14,271,000,000,000. My point: the $100 mil that 'banker' stole is nothing compared to the most corrupt Government in the history of the U.S.
-
Well I certainly do agree with Roseanne at least 3 points so far:
1) No-one needs to own more than 100 million. I'd say that's 5 times more than any one person needs to own, though. But fine.
2) Those bankers do deserve to get beheaded.
3) Hunger should be eliminated and it could be done.
-
Roseanne pretends not to be communist or globalist and employs the standard shill feigned support for some key truths but twists it along globalist lines. There are compartmentalised shills that support some key topics to infiltrate the movement but roundly reject others that they should otherwise support. I notice she didn't mention the 'female intelligence' of Janet Napolitano or Hillary Clinton. Alex surely sees through her.
-
I personally think Roseanne is pushing one of the globalist agendas, the degradation of patriarchal roles and the promotion of the female. This ties in with their attack on Christianity and their promotion of a Gaia, eco-fascist mother goddess religion to control the masses that ties in with their Eco fascist carbon world governance infrastructure. Her views of the death penalty together with non-libertarianism and a communist style attack on the rich rings alarm bells.
-
She is certifiable. She needs to be sent to some sort of crazy people camp Ha, She said PIG. LOL
She is 100% serious. She made it clear that she's "not for a republic" but a social democracy where government has to tell the people what jobs they can work, how much a business can make and where all proceeds go.
Alex Jones even hesitates when she hits the soft spots and this is probably the last we'll see her on his show. Once an insider, always an insider. She's no different than Palin. A fraud, a shill. Infowars better clean up it's act, they never broadcasted crap like this before!
TheOffensiveuser 5 months ago 6
Alex Jones needs interview Dave Chappelle
IblewuponyourfaceIII 4 months ago 2