AEF Highlights - Jennifer Marohasy
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (Bushvision)
All Comments (9)
-
@Bushvision haha I know its two years later but that is a hilarious defence. "Ask them, I dunno!!!"
Who IS paying you?
-
jennifer, you are PATHETIC stooge
-
ipa well there is hidden agenda with them for sure
-
how do you sleep at night jennifer
-
how do you sleep at night jennifer
-
Sure the person organising the conference contacted certain individuals for sponsorship. I personally had no involvement with Murray irrigation. I (as part of the board gave someone a job. (to organise a conference) They did it. Because there were no deals or promises involved by AEF there was no need for me (as a board member to make any decision regarding murray irrigation. If that insults someone so be it.
-
My question was this: is it credible to say that you had "nothing to do with the groups....mentioned" when they were major sponsors of a conference held by an organisation of which you are a board member.... a fair enough question, I feel.
To expect your audience to believe that Murray Irrigation sponsoring a conference where environmental issues on the Murray River are to be discussed is not a conflict of interest, is quite simply insulting their intelligence.
-
So what`s the big deal. The board asks some one to organise a conference & they do it. So what difference does it make who the sponsors are. They pay to have their name splashed around much like advertising on TV works. They don`t dictate what the speakers will say or what the membership want - just like TV advertisers don`t dictate what programs go on TV.
-
"I don`t have anything to do with the other groups you mentioned" - so as a board member of the Australian Environment foundation, you were unaware that Murray Irrigation were a major sponsor of your 2006 Conference at Rydges Southbank? The conference in fact, where this video was filmed!! One might say, to draw a long bow, that Jennifer Marohasy's talk on the Murray water levels and salinity, were sponsored by Murray Irrigation....now that's a sweetheart deal innit?
11:33Stewart Braddock shares fossils and mining storiesby Bushvision92 views
- 0:30Progress is good advertby Bushvision1,775 views
- 0:30The Climate Sceptics TV ad - Green laws destroy...by Bushvision3,977 views
- 0:30Climate Sceptics TV ad on Wind power Problemsby Bushvision8,055 views
- 3:17the climate debate gets heated...by abcqanda1,755 views
- 1:18Brisbane No Carbon Tax Rally: Jennifer Marohasyby TQPBrisbaneCentral449 views
- 9:56Salinity & Temperature of Waterby young108west1,848 views
- 2:30Salinity - Density Demonstrationby rodbensonhelena2,965 views
- 4:152009 Boars Gone Wild Spear Hunt #3by jganschow50,278 views
- 2:15Murray River Documentaryby nbassett4144,986 views
- 4:58RIPby mel13199030,750 views
- 1:59Guerra's Murray Codby AlexGGRoss12,430 views
- 5:06AEF Highlights - Michael Duffyby Bushvision331 views
- 7:37Measuring salinityby SaltlandGenie81 views
- 6:15Jennifer Marohasyby mmattjanet61 views
- 10:54Q&A - Attack of the Climate Change Skepticsby nonameisacat2,072 views
- 2:26Pig Shooting from the Chopperby recidivideo495,193 views
- 8:53Why The IPCC models are wrong pt 2by Bushvision5,997 views
- 5:09AEF Highlights - Don Burkeby Bushvision199 views
- 9:42Ilmastorikospaljastus Prof.Bob Carter 1 of 4by Pakkaspyry290 views
So someone from your organisation - the Australian "Environment" Foundation - who is/was also an office bearer of the IPA (which has a well documented relationship with your Foundation), has a serious allegation of conflict of interest levelled at her, and your response is basically "no comment". Is that right? Not good enough mate
cheeseepeas 4 years ago
The issue is with the IPA. You should level the allegation at the IPA & get a response.
AEF will become concerned if when the IPA cannot give a good response.
Bushvision 4 years ago