Obama's OUTRAGEOUS ARROGANCE & Divisiveness

•••• Supporting articles ••••
"Smart Aleck-in-Chief?" http://tinyurl.com/26l2s27
"Strikingly Unpresidential" http://tinyurl.com/2eqsrob
"Arrogance in the Executive" http://tinyurl.com/25957o4
"Origins of O's Petulance" http://is.gd/ffu5n
"Obama brings Nixonian twist to oil spill" http://is.gd/cGfTB

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Barack
• Obama
• arrogant
• healthcare
• Obamacare
• mocking
• cops
• medical
• doctors
• tea
• party
• baggers
• bitter
• clingers
• news
• analysis
• politics
• comedy
• divisive
• amputate

[luvitluvitbaby]

For Republicans to call healthcare reform Armageddon is over the top and ridiculous! They deserved to be mocked and dismissed for their stupid characterizations!

Every developed country in the WORLD has universal healthcare! So if universal healthcare could end the world it would have ended it long before Obama's rise to power lol!

[ensignbay]

@luvitluvitbaby Government-controlled healthcare is bankrupting every other developed nation that has it. It's unsustainable. The ONLY way to control costs is to increase personal control and responsibility.

[luvitluvitbaby]

@ensignbay That's not true lol! Canada isn't bankrupt, neither is Norway or Australia.I could keep going but you should get the picture. 16% of our GDP was going toward healthcare and rising while everyone else stayed at about 11%. On top that they got better health outcomes than us and covered everyone!

The U.S. staying with the status qua would be like you paying $7.5 million for a $150k house in a $250k valued neighborhood! That would be stupid on your part and you should know this.

[ensignbay]

@luvitluvitbaby I didn't mean the private sector Canada is bankrupt, but the Canadian government was heading toward insolvency. Canada has made some reforms over the past decade that has CUT the size of government. The Canadian economy has responded well. Canada proves that big nanny state programs are not sustainable.

Norway and Australia are MUCH smaller than the U.S. and don't have millions of poor illegal immigrants stressing their systems.

[luvitluvitbaby]

@ensignbay I understand, I'm not for total government control and I'm not for absolutely no government involvement. I fall into the middle. I don't believe government should be a crutch for the lazy, but it can serve a purpose in assisting us with a base line for a civilized society. You wrote "Norway and Australia are MUCH smaller than the U.S. and don't have millions of poor illegal immigrants stressing their systems."

More Whites receive entitlements than any other group by far. Just sayin

[ensignbay]

@luvitluvitbaby The US Constitution delegates ZERO power to the Federal Government to run entitlement programs. Constitutionally, this power is retained by the States and/or the people.

The federal government is simply not inherintly structured to manage much, really ONLY those powers listed in the Constitution.

Now with more big-government countries being downgraded, this is borne out in Europe as well.

[fastfoodclowns]

"I, me, my" -- Obama's three favorite words.

[warfossil]

@luvitluvitbaby The world is going bankrupt. No country is safe.

[luvitluvitbaby]

@ensignbay The U.S, Constitution makes no mention of entitlements specifically in favor of or against, because entitlements didn't exist at the time. It did however make a reference to the common good of our society.

I would like to point out that the Constitution never mentioned television, radio, the Internet, automobiles or iphones either. Would these items be unconstitutional too?

[JakeBlakeProject]

Now that's transparency..