"That is certainly interesting" - does this mean you've never seen the east penthouse collapse?
I've asked this once already and you didn't answer it. I'd like to address the rest of the points you make in response to the video of the east penthouse, because you raise a good point.
but can you tell me if you've ever seen the east penthouse collapse before? a simple yes or no. this is not a gotcha question, I am legitimately curious if you've seen this before.
That is certainly interesting, but you can also see that whatever collapsed in the top left corner, the structure of the building was still intact enough to stop it from collapsing further, and then like at a magic touch, the structure that was solid a moment ago crumbled to dust and didnt stop till the very base of the building.
If you ask my opinion about the video, that very first moment where top left collapsed seemed like a natural collapse. Then stand still and leveled
here, look at this: watch?v=1bjrAJVp4ds&feature=channel_video_title
the collapse of the building begins at the start of this video. the "main part" of the building does not start to collapse until 8 or 9 seconds into it.
be honest, have you ever seen this before? the vast majority of truther sites leave it out completely.
"No" - no what? no you don't know about the east penthouse? if not, what?
"what you are saying is that the complete internal structure of the building vanished within 10 seconds..." - no I'm not.
you realize you can ask if I am saying something rather than assume it, don't you?
if you don't know about the east penthouse, not only does that prove the failure of truther "info," it shows why you are so confused about this. look it up. vids on my homepage show its collapse.
No, however what you are saying is that the complete internal structure of the building vanished within 10 seconds without any outside sign except for a few broken windows. Then, after 10 seconds the building came down at nearly ff speed.
what was heard 9.5 sec before collapse was visible was the internal collapse that led to the east penthouse collapse. since that event, plus the pause the preceded the rest of the building came down took about 9.5 seconds, that explains it.
the "shockwave" was the internal collapse.
truthers leave out the east penthouse factor all the time. now it seems they are simply pretending it never happened.
Thanks
abeldanger(dot)net
OttoLund 1 week ago
More info than the totally unpeer reviewed nist official report.
zenoist2 2 months ago
things are gonna get mighty rough ... here in Gomorrah-By-The-Sea
ryanshaunkelly 4 months ago
@Aerensiniac I agree, unclesamsnephew666 is a joke.
DesmoRob 5 months ago
@Aerensiniac
"That is certainly interesting" - does this mean you've never seen the east penthouse collapse?
I've asked this once already and you didn't answer it. I'd like to address the rest of the points you make in response to the video of the east penthouse, because you raise a good point.
but can you tell me if you've ever seen the east penthouse collapse before? a simple yes or no. this is not a gotcha question, I am legitimately curious if you've seen this before.
unclesamsnephew666 5 months ago
@unclesamsnephew666
That is certainly interesting, but you can also see that whatever collapsed in the top left corner, the structure of the building was still intact enough to stop it from collapsing further, and then like at a magic touch, the structure that was solid a moment ago crumbled to dust and didnt stop till the very base of the building.
If you ask my opinion about the video, that very first moment where top left collapsed seemed like a natural collapse. Then stand still and leveled
Aerensiniac 5 months ago
@Aerensiniac
here, look at this: watch?v=1bjrAJVp4ds&feature=channel_video_title
the collapse of the building begins at the start of this video. the "main part" of the building does not start to collapse until 8 or 9 seconds into it.
be honest, have you ever seen this before? the vast majority of truther sites leave it out completely.
unclesamsnephew666 5 months ago
@Aerensiniac
"No" - no what? no you don't know about the east penthouse? if not, what?
"what you are saying is that the complete internal structure of the building vanished within 10 seconds..." - no I'm not.
you realize you can ask if I am saying something rather than assume it, don't you?
if you don't know about the east penthouse, not only does that prove the failure of truther "info," it shows why you are so confused about this. look it up. vids on my homepage show its collapse.
unclesamsnephew666 5 months ago
@unclesamsnephew666
No, however what you are saying is that the complete internal structure of the building vanished within 10 seconds without any outside sign except for a few broken windows. Then, after 10 seconds the building came down at nearly ff speed.
So how... "common" is such an occurrence?
Aerensiniac 5 months ago
@Aerensiniac
what was heard 9.5 sec before collapse was visible was the internal collapse that led to the east penthouse collapse. since that event, plus the pause the preceded the rest of the building came down took about 9.5 seconds, that explains it.
the "shockwave" was the internal collapse.
truthers leave out the east penthouse factor all the time. now it seems they are simply pretending it never happened.
do you know about the east penthouse?
unclesamsnephew666 5 months ago