Bishop Jones on the UM Worldwide Nature amendments

United Methodist Bishop Scott Jones presents his perspective on the amendments for the worldwide nature of the church.

Visit www.worldwideumc.org for more information about the amendments.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• United
• Methodist
• Church
• Bishop
• Scott
• Jones
• Worldwide
• Nature
• Amendment
• Connectional
• Table
• Global
• Africa
• Philipines

[strayvideo]

I DO believe in looking clearly, honestly and frankly at all these issues, reserving the right to ask our bishops about their planning, vision and foresight. However, I also believe that contemptuous responses like yours do little to forward intelligent conversation.

Senior Rev- ACT like one, please. You are called to reflect Christian principles in all your words and actions, guiding your flock and (presumably) your staff in ways that show Christ, not your sardonic wit.

[scientastic]

I take a similar stance on the problem: that perhaps some parts of the denomination around the world do not get proper representation.

However, there is no need to vote on this now before we know exactly what the committee will set up. Let us see exactly what the new structure will be and then vote on it.

Good legislation-- and PARTICULARLY constitutional amendments-- are clear, specific and unambiguous. I feel too many of our amendments this year do not have these qualities.

[kbj76]

I am taking Maxie Dunnam's stance.

[NUKD]

At General Conference 2004 one liberal delegate responded to an African's statement on homosexuality: "Obviously this issue is more of a problem in some cultures (hear "regions") than in others." Bishop Jone's intentions are fine. But these amendments will be misused by others to fracture our unity.

[NUKD]

These amendments ask us to sign a blank check -- we won't know until the 2012 task force reports what the new structure will be, how much it will cost and what issues will be handled separately. All we know for sure is the voice and vote of the developing world will be less in the matters that come before the US Church.

[leahrose215]

I actually would argue it's a power that many desire to keep that is not actually the US's to control. The loss of political UM power (to make decisions on discipline and judicial cases) is significant. It's needs to be a willingness of the US UMC to allow the equality of numbers to be represented. I think what part of the problem is, that there are many who believe that they deserve the power and that the power should remain where it is.

[fdgdsch]

Actually, Bishop Jones is a frequent guest of the liberal Reconciling Ministries Network, of which I am a supporter. I agree with you that the current distribution of delegates is an example of colonialism (or, worse yet, outright racism). What makes many so suspicious is that although Bishop Jones "says" in thsi video that Regional Conferences will not create their own doctrinal and social principles, the fact that the amendment contains no language to that effect is a dangerous blank check.

[sheyduck]

"if we shift to regional conferences then the US loses their significant power."

What power? (I don't mean that sarcastically - what or which power is the US trying to hold on to?) Is it power we (the US) needs to or ought to hold on to?

[sheyduck]

but to save a video record to catalog Jones' promises of what will/will not happen as a result might be interesting.

[leahrose215]

Is it that the liberals are afraid of the conservative church in africa swinging the votes or, are people afraid of the african church taking control of the votes. according the eddy fox's video-it's almost 40% non-US church membership, but voting members at general conference is 80% US. if we shift to regional conferences then the US loses their significant power. Perhaps we need to consider the current arrangement as colonialism.

and fdgdsch, Bishop Jones has NEVER been called liberal.