Re: Catholic Issues: Transubstantiation/Apocrypha-Liturgy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
708 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 10, 2008

A refutation of the Elevation argument James White presents in his argument.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Good video. James White, is a great orator and good at giving rhetoric, but time and time again, it has been shown if you slow down his videos and take note of the substance of what he says, really his arguments are not that good! That is because James White is a great debater but an awful theologian and a master at subtly twisting truth. He will have to give account to God on judgment day for his behavior.

  • He wasn't attempting to prove the doctrine. He was rebutting an argument against it.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dangerousdan71 To make such claims against a person, you should be able to at least cite evidence for your claims. Do you have any?

  • One way or the other Trans is a con job, like every other dogma RCC has released ~~ Mary co redemptrix and all the other Pagan tripe.

    How does a person come to believe all this Garbage?

    It has to be some Satanic influence in my opinion.

  • This Guy still has not proven the Doctrine Of Transubstantiation, because it was only Official Dogma in the year 1200s.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more