Banachek bending Silverware on Unscrewed
Uploader Comments (zab666)
Top Comments
-
the host is a douche.
-
Lol, he puts Uri Gellar to shame, and has the decency not to pretend he's really bending them with his mind.
All Comments (118)
-
@Megaritz I'm with you. I found him a bit unpolished for a host at first, but then he just seemed more and more authentically himself. I ended up quite liking him.
-
Banachek at his best !
-
my lord i enver realized how hot that girl host was watching this when i was younger
-
I read the comments first. Lot of hate for the host. Could he really be that bad? Yes. What an embarrassing tool. But then most talk show hosts are pretty much the same.
-
I had to stop the video halfway through just so I could say that, while Banachek is awesome, the host is a gigantic cockbag and every TV station, camera supply store, and every retail outlet which sells cathode ray tubes for any purpose whatsoever should dickslap him with a 500 mile restraining order. Okay. Back to the video.
-
Exactly, I am thinking and speaking but I am not doing. I am still here at home and abroad living vicariously through the lot of you. I got a lot of work to do on myself but I wanted to share where I was at. : )
-
Personally, I like the host. He wasn't being a douche. He wasn't disrespecting the trick. It's just his personality to act like he does, and I don't find it remotely disagreeable.
-
@truthIsStranger loading trinity ...66,6% done...
-
Holy Trinity: Thoughts, words, actions. Think of people who can only manifest their good intentions as one or two of the three; this results in 3 forms of behaviour that allow sin to thrive among good people.
Thought and actions, impure words: Not helping anyone.
Actions and words, impure thoughts: same.
Words and thoughts, impure actions: same.
666 = 66.6%, an incomplete trinity.
I spoke to God on Salvia and She set me on the path to understanding this. She was ANGRY though..!
-
He taught of all of this at his lecture:D
It's 666, also there wasn't an FFF, that was just something idiots put in since it was the 6th number of the alphabet. Wiki is not a perfect source for info either. Also, the bible is still being translated to this day.
Linchpin333 3 years ago
I never claimed that wiki is perfect, but the article on the "number of the beast" seems pretty reliable to me....everything is cited.
however it doesnt matter, because I chose this name not to offend...i only needed some numbers easy to remember. If i had know that it is such an insult to some I would have picked....no I would have picked it anyway :P
zab666 3 years ago
it's not 636, it's 666. Where the hell did you read that it was 636? dumb.
Linchpin333 3 years ago
oh sorry, it is 616. Look it up on wiki or google it. As you may not know, the bible wasn't written in english and therefore translated several times in different languages. Due to this numerous times of tranlating there are versions in which the "number of the beast" is 616 and also 666. 666 is just the more popular one.
...gosh, its just a three digit number...
zab666 3 years ago