News Reporter's First Impressions of the WTC Collapse

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,442
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 25, 2006

The first impressions from news reporters before the media machine took over.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (muzicmaker2001)

  • Most of you are morons. The steel supports in the top gave out which brought it down, thus causing more and more weight to pile upon the towers which brought it down. NOT COMPLICATED!

  • @paddjo

    These can't be the morons you are refering to?

    patriotsquestion911*com/engine­ers*html

    1,300+ Engineers and Architects

Top Comments

  • @maureenOWW

    I think you have your facts a little off. The WTC building manager actually stated the Towers could sustain multiple impacts of jet liners.

    watch?v=64W8bzXfGCA

    And the plane impact does not explain WTC7's collapse. No plane impact.

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I can tell you this from my point of view, and take it or leave it. The Twin towers, was huge towers, their fragments, and steel supplies weighted over thousands of tonnes, - Now, have all that frequently collapse in Less than 12 seconds. Think about it. 12 seconds, coming rumbling down ontop of itself, the street and other buildings. Now that would do some damage aye? - It was a weakening explosion from the Jet fuel that brought them down, not bombs, not thermite, nothing. This is my OPINION.

  • if u ask me the only obvious demolition is wtc 7...as for the others i can't speak with much confidence as i am no engineer.

  • @apoplexy1974 Don't like our country? LEAVE!

    For one our government, no matter how corrupt, wouldn't murder thousands just for oil. Think about it: It would cost millions and millions of dollars. Not worth the little the oil might bring in. See the problem?

  • @maureenOWW Sorry, who do you think you are? The architects say, they constructed the building against airplane crashes. ( /watch?v=Ri471QSMPGY ) There was an accident with a bomber and the Empire State building, so they knew about the danger. Also you could know that cerosin can't melt steel. BUT ther WAS molten steel. It came obviously out the building. Explane me now, what "high rise fires" and "an airliner" wich WASN'T full of fue!! "travelling at 500mph" can do this.

  • i wonder from the american media . they make muslims are responsable about that while ther were 3000 jewish didnt go to the  towers in that day. and after that the usa army take iraq and agfanistan for ther oil , what amazing act . what aliers

  • @ishotbooth ... from what you have said it sounds like you have done no research at all

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more