SHOCKING, WHALER RAMS SEA SHEPHERD's VESSEL

please support sea shepherd at www.seashepherd.org donate if you can. DUTCH GOVERNMENT; THIS IS AN ATTACK ON VESSELS FROM AN ORGANIZATION WHO HAS ALSO A VESSEL SAILING UNDER DUTCH COLORS. EVEN MORE IMPORTANT ONE OF THE ADY GIL HER CREW MEMBERS IS DUTCH. DO YOUR DUTY AND SUMMON JAPAN FOR AN EXPLANATION!!!
Seashepherd is a non profit organization which does care for our wildlife. no one is willing to enforce the law in the Antarctic considering the whale hunt. Japan (as well as Norway) sails under false "scientific research" in order to fulfill the market's demand on whale meat. how can you sell the idea that in order to protect the whales your research means killing and meat processing ??? SOME PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DIE IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE WHALES AND SOME ARE WILLING TO KILL THOSE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO GET TO THEIR WHALE MEAT . BTW I SAW HOW VIDEOS ON YOU TUBE WERE RATED 1 OR 2 STARS (WITH OVER 40 RATINGS) WHICH MEANS THAT THAT IS A WAR GOING ON TO GET THIS FOOTAGE OUT OF THE CHARTS, so for the first and only time i will disable ratings on a video

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• ady
• gil
• sea
• shepherd
• steve
• irwin
• bob
• barker
• whaler
• whale
• whales
• arctic
• hunters
• Japan
• Dutch
• flag
• murderers
• assassin
• green
• peace
• conspiracy

[fuck3r15]

I hate this japans ships they killing whale and then they sell meet of wheal in japan for 35$ us dolars!!The capitan must pay!!He destroy Ady gil!!

[makiwa]

If you want to pull in front of a Steel Ship and get clobbered you shouldn't winge! They are lucky they didn't get completely crushed.... If it wanted to not get hit, it could've avoided it being much smaller and more maneuverable vessel, but it had full power ahead to get in front of the S/S.... If you want to play 'Hard-Ball' don't cry foul afterwards...... Personally I think they're reckless and stupid.

[MrSNOWBLAST]

@MrSNOWBLAST and yeah i know you are on "our" side, my comment is more some sort of an addition to your reply on unserviam's

[MrSNOWBLAST]

@psycopink to change the course of history, it takes heroes and those heroes are usually called murderers or terrorists in their times. someone willing to die for his cause isn't per definition a murderer. obstruction isn't the same as attacking and in order to make a change there have to be so called "extremists" . they still be dumping nuclear waist in the the sea if it hadn't been for those green peace "terrorists" in the eighties. complaining to corporate paid governments won't do JS

[psycopink]

@unserviam i recently went on the stveve erwin, and am 100% sure thy r not murders, i dont tink their first choice would b violence, but wot do they have to do to get these whale murders to take notice and realise, sea shep REACTS to wot the whalers do, so ina sense the whalers dictate the outcome,, lets not get confused bout who the murders r, sea shep has no intention to murder the whalers, but whalers dont mind using grenadeS, ETC, gota look at the bigger pic here mate.. neway peace out! :)

[rosepetal108]

When the SM2 rammed the Ady Gil it was not a defensive move, it was an attacking move. 100% Your premise is false, therefore any conclusions you draw from it are also false.

PS You were wrong about the poachers in the national park analogy too. Luckily you don't get to decide or we would be at war with Japan again. Your idea to try and provoke an already dangerous situation in a shooting war is downright evil.

[unserviam]

On the matter of defensive weapons. Do you agree with me that it would be kinder to the antarctic environment for the Japanese to employ gelled fuel Flamethrowers or good old fashioned lead slinging guns to defend themselves against any further Ramming from the Terrorist ships?

I am thinking that the Gelled Fuel will mostly adhere to the superstructure of the terrorist vessels as it burns the vessel and the attackers, whereas the lead-poisoning will persist in the water environment for years.

[unserviam]

Many things which 'cannot happen' do in fact happen. It is illegal for the Terrorists to Ram their ships into the ships of the Japanese who the Terrorists have gone to sea in hunt of, yet that thing which can't happen did and does happen, so let us not be all too amazed if the Japanese actually decide to value the lives of their crewmen, and defend themselves if violently attacked again at sea by these Pirate flagged Terrorists.

I prefer Flamethrowers to guns. Guns pollute the water with lead!

[unserviam]

@rosepetal108 Treaties notwithstanding, it is legal in all places at all times for a person to use whatever means as may be necessary to defend ones own life. The people who man the Terrorist ships owe the Japanese Vessels their very lives because the Japanese have as of yet only tried evasive maneuvers, and spraying water at the Terrorists, and warning them away by loudspeaker. The Japanese could have legally shot the Terrorists dead when they were Rammed by the large ship. I recommend selfdefe

[unserviam]

@rosepetal108 You say it is illegal to defend yourself which is nonsense? I have asked you earlier if you thought it was right for someone to defend their live, and you didn't answer, because I guess in your view it would all depend on who was doing the attacking. In this case it is the Terrorists Trying to Kill the Japanese, so I assume you would say that of course the Japanese should not be allowed to defend themselves. They would be breaking a law you may say, but I say they may indeed do so