Judge Martha Anderson Show Cause Hearing for Contempt

The link to the transcript Prohibiting Nicoletti's scammed clients from attending church or court together, and violates their constitutional rights!

http://courthouseforum.com/upload/phpv4WKob.Transcript%20Nicoletti%20v%20Drei...


Clerk charged PPO respondent's credit card without a court order, without Respondent's knowldege $500, thus committing credit card fraud, identity theft,conversion and embezzlement

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Judge
• Martha
• Anderson
• Paul
• Nicoletti
• Oakland
• County
• Michigan

[SisterMaryLitigation]

Denial of Due Process. No Order to appeal = EXTORTION !

[SisterMaryLitigation]

The female respondent (former client) documented the corruption, perjury and fraud-upon-the-court by Attny Nicoletti’ PPO petition which Judge Anderson ignored.

NO CASE, NO ORDER. There is NO LAW which prohibits correcting a false public record and the judge asks for cash. Aka Extortion. The clerk charged only $5 then committed credit card fraud and identity theft for charging an additional $495 WITHOUT the knowledge or consent of the litigant.

[jburr36]

This bitch was trying to use the court as a means to fulfill a personal vendetta against her ex. She got nailed by the judge and deserved what she got. I despise people that use the police or the courts for spite against an ex. These people ought to be publically humiliated.

[SuperInnerpeace]

@ShelbyCitizen I'm thinking if I was going to go in front of the judge as in her case, I would go representing my self not pro se but sui juris. /that would have really ticked off the judge BUT the judge could have given her the information or at least what she had in front of her and I do believe she had a right to request it. I do believe if she had been sui juris the judge may have acted a little differently. Of course she may have sent her straight to jail, I have heard of that happening.

[ShelbyCitizen]

I am thinking this woman should be in jail. I do not know any of the parties but I do know that if a judge orders you to pay 500.00 for a frivolous motion (wasting the courts time and resources), you need to pay it. If the clerk makes a mistake this woman should have hired a lawyer. Judges have no respect for citizens without a lawyer. Remember, they were all lawyers once.

[djmarkcotter]

omg last time she could have gotten contempt....which could mean jail time, she should have just paid the money

[kate1537]

Not true. The Court speaks through its written orders. Check the law. I am a family attorney. If the judge issues an oral decision, it MUST be reduced to a written order -- if it is not -- then blame your attorney or yourself if you are in pro per.

[Howdy2Doody]

This judge sanctioned the abused lady, without a court rule or law to rely upon for sanctions, without a court order, and without a case, so the lady was just a bystander. Look up the legal definition of EXTORTION. Why is there a SHOW CAUSE HEARING for CONTEMPT, when the clerk made an error. Look at all the Court rules which were violated. We have rule of law, improper service, no affidavit, etc.

[kenjohnsonmusic]

remember, the judge can make an order from the bench. Doesn't have to be written to get you to comply first.