Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Truth About Monopolies and Anti-Trust Laws

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,868
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 16, 2011

PLEASE RATE & SUBSCRIBE!

On June 24, 2011 Mark Hendrickson lectured at the Freedom University: Current Events Summer Seminar. In this video Professor Hendrickson discusses monopolies and anti-trust laws.

Watch the full lecture here: http://youtu.be/uBpvzIDZfHI
Find out more about our Summer Seminars here: http://www.fee.org/seminars/

Directed by Brian D. Aitken http://www.briandaitken.com
Produced by Steven Patterson

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The Robber Barron's were also helped out by government by creating barriers to entry.

  • @TurdFergisson

    In a market without government, if a monopoly does occur such as with the Bell Companies it tends to be that they provide a cheap service for consumers that negates competition. This isn't because of any criminal act, it's that consumers just don't see the value of buying something else. This isn't a bad thing, we people aren't stupid, if we don't like something we get something we do like for the price we want it at.

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dmh724 Some. Your statement is a gross generalisation.

  • @dtmoura: I think it is a nice shirt.... He knows how to combine it.

  • I agree with most of what this guy had said. I've also seen it said many times before... except the other times, it wasnt this boring.

  • @june372 Look, I am a Libertarian here, I just get annoyed by the common argument that monopolies don't exist outside of government license. It's a bad argument, not supported by empirical data, and not supported by economic theory. To write off monopoly as a government creation without real implications in a pure exchange system is just bad economics.

  • @june372 "The government seems to find competitive pricing 'anti-competitive' or 'predatory'."

    Monopolistic pricing schemes are by definition not competitive, and calling non-competitive pricing "competitive" (your words) just doesn't make a lot of sense.

    When monopolies set prices above the competitive market-clearing price (ie above the theoretical point where marginal revenue equals marginal cost) there is deadweight loss, also known as social inefficiency.

  • @Thentox What about it?

  • what about tesco?

  • As a gcc college student, this kicks some major ass...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more