Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

60 Minutes Bill James Part 1

Bill James on 60 Minutes  
 
Customize

More From: freespeach14

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

14 ratings
Sign in to rate
6,661 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (15)   Options

Loading...
LadyBlutHecate (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ah darn I was looking for the Vilma Leake video.
bblefty9 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yeah... It's guys like you who Beane exploits. Other teams have just caught up. Read Moneyball.
bubbabubbabooba (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
why would any team want to "catch up" with Billy Beane's way of general managing a team? his recent teams have been terrible, and all he does is blame the Oakland fans and the "market" his teams in, and uses injuries as an excuse. The guy is a complainer and whiner and will never win a championship.
I wouldn't read that stupid book. The title say's it all......"Money" ball.........Money is what has ruined professional sports......Overpaid players, managers and idiot GM's like Billy Beane
Madnis64 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"His teams of the last few years have been terrible"

That's because he was the first to do it, around 2001 or 2002, he knew what to look for in players and what not to look for. Part of the reason his teams have been terible the last few years is because other teams starting catching on. Oakland has a small team salary, and now that Beane's strategy has been publicized, the price of the attributes in players he liked best, have inflated and they can no longer afford what they could in 2002.
bubbabubbabooba (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
excuses, excuses..sorry I don't buy your theory. If Beane was the GM everyone seems to think he is, he'd come up with some creative ideas to put a winner on the field. Sure Beanes teams may have been the first to have some success with moneyball, but he didn't invent it like so many think. It was the A's owners in the mid 90's, Schott and Hoffman along with then GM Alderson who did. Beane was the assistant GM. Beane's teams won alot in the regular season but fell apart in the playoffs.
Madnis64 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"he'd come up with some creative ideas to put a winner on the field."

It's hard to do with a very low payroll. And how many alternatives do you think there are? There are only so many ways to rate players by their statistics. Now that people know that it was OBP and SLG that led to a winning ballclub, the price of that skill has gone up. What can Beane do? Go back to the old conventional ways of building a team? That would be a step back. He didnt invent it, but he was smart enough to use it
Madnis64 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Beane's teams won alot in the regular season but fell apart in the playoffs."

This was explained in Moneyball. Small sample size. You need to have enough games and enough time for your strategy to pan out, it doesnt work in a 5 or 7 game series. Beane said this and i believe it, he said that it is only his job to get to the playoffs, whatever happens after that is luck.
Madnis64 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Let me just add - I believe strongly that the Phillies winning the world series was complete luck. The Rays and Red Sox were better than them in almost every category. I heard a lot about how the Phillies had an "Edge". What does that even mean? It makes as much sense as clutch hitting, it's not an edge that wins ballgames, it's having the knowledge and having the time - most importantly- to win.
bubbabubbabooba (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Beane, what a complete moron...to say that it's only his job to make the playoffs....and the payroll issue is bull......that was with the previous owners who were tight with their money........Lou Wolff has alot more, and he squandered millions in trying to move the team to Fremont......if he had instead spent what he lost in the failed Fremont move, on players like Matt Holiday and Dan Haren, who are in their prime, along with improving the Oakland Coliseum, he'd have a succesful product.
Madnis64 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
A moron? Really? Look at what he's done. If i could bring anyone to the Met's front office to replace Omar - it would be Beane. You're saying he didnt have any effect on this new way of thinking about Baseball players? What wins? What doesnt? And im sorry, but what are you saying about Holliday? The A's traded for Holliday, then made one of the greatest trades of the decade in getting ride of him. Trading a soon to be FA at the end of the season for a top prospect - sounds good to me.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.