Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Proper Forum (Part 2 of 9) - The Rule of Law and the Global War on Terrorism - Washburn Law

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
54 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 19, 2009

Subtitle: Military Commissions or Other Alternatives? On November 13, 2001, President Bush ordered the detention of suspected terrorists subject to trial by military commission. After the Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that the President lacked authority to unilaterally establish military commissions, Congress enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2006, effectively endorsing the use of military tribunals to try detainees. In Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), the Supreme Court held that the military commissions established by Congress are not a sufficient substitute for the constitutional right of habeas corpus. Panelists discuss the fate of military commissions in light of Boumdiene, and explore other alternatives for adjudicating detainees. Moderator: David J. R. Frakt. Panelists: Amos Guiora, Gabor Rona, Samuel V. Jones. For more information visit: http://washburnlaw.edu/ruleoflaw/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more