nice game physics :-)
NOTICE
This video contains an audio track that has not been authorized by WMG. The audio has been disabled. More about copyright
Uploader Comments (bringdapainGER)
Top Comments
-
look at the date....
All Comments (294)
-
This isn't suck a big thing, most of the poly's are boxes and cylinders... not that hard for a CPU to handle, even back in 2007 it wasn't ^^
-
Doesn't differ much from Havok.
-
I have an asus laptop, they are awesome :)
-
it's like Crysis, but that game is like a year older, and it's graphics are probably still best up to date...
-
what game is this or is this a physics demo
-
hey how are you all getting the textures and lighting effects to show up in your games? I cant figure out why they dont show up when i test my game, but when i click 'Render current frame' everything's intact. Please help cuz this is very frustrating
-
Name of the game ???
-
why do you even need a gun!!!!!!?!?!?!
-
WHAT IS THIS? WHY CAN'T I HAS?!
-
@bbooster1 Minecraft is the best game ever created.
Haha
I feel so sorry for you mate
All these people who are like "OMG WHAT GAME"
I already got it
Im just wondering what card you using?
Im using a 9800GTX+ but this looks better :P
Not fps wise but physics wise
tinymouse2 3 years ago 5
yeah you right, most of the people simply don´t read the description^^
in 2007 I used a Asus PhsyX PCI card with 128MB, GFX was a 7800GTX SLI system. the FPS in this video are bad because of the single core processor.
bringdapainGER 3 years ago 3
lolz.You know that the "PhsyX" card is supposed to unload the work from the processor?
adrian15041994 3 years ago 3
yes I know, but the FPS are bad because of the use of fraps for this video. fraps + cellfactor + singlecore = bad FPS (no matter how good your GFX or PPU is). without fraps the frames are pretty high. the PPU works great.
bringdapainGER 3 years ago