The Universe Exists by the Necessity of Its own Nature!
Loading...
Loading...
10:23
How Did the Universe Begin? (1 of 4)by drcraigvideos4,710 views- 2:10
If God Exists, Then Objective Morality Cannot Exist!by drcraigvideos2,580 views
- 9:17
2. The Hiddenness of God (Why isn't God more obvious?)by drcraigvideos893 views
- 1:36
Naturalism Requires Faithby drcraigvideos2,387 views
- 9:31
How Did the Universe Begin? (2 of 4)by drcraigvideos2,059 views
- 5:58
The Universe Just Is! It Needs No Explanation!by drcraigvideos1,527 views
- 5:03
Does science prove everything?by drcraigvideos5,620 views
- 1:08
Saying God is the Explanation Doesn't Explain Anythingby drcraigvideos2,980 views
- 15:00
The Grand Design: A Critique (2 of 3)by drcraigvideos2,371 views
- 10:56
The absurdity of life without God (3 of 3) by William Lane Craigby drcraigvideos3,133 views
- 2:20
There's Something About Peter Atkins' Nothingby drcraigvideos2,057 views
- 4:14
Atheism and Nihilismby drcraigvideos11,913 views
- 3:07
Can atheists trust their own minds?by drcraigvideos11,529 views
- 0:38
Something You Don't Want to See on the Truck In Front of You on the Highwayby CincinnatiGifts1,908,891 views
- 8:36
7 Reasons God Exists and 3 Reasons It Makes a Difference (1 of 6)by drcraigvideos3,006 views
- 10:56
The absurdity of life without God (1 of 3) by William Lane Craigby drcraigvideos7,522 views
- 2:14:27
William Lane Craig vs Lawrence Kraussby drcraigvideos20,176 views
- 23:13
Kalam Cosmological Argument - Part 1 - William Lane Craigby drcraigvideos2,635 views
- 11:34
Does Luke 23:43 prove that the dead are alive in Paradise?by howdytheresir393 views
- 15:00
The Psychology of Atheism (1 of 4)by exposedatheists2,225 views
@TheSameDonkey Well, you almost say it dont you. A 100% faithful simulation is no simulation at all. It is the occurrence.
The most accurate simulation, while remaining one, would be 99.999(rep) accurate.
Keatrocity 1 year ago
@philochristos Ahh, but the distinction is based on our perceptions.
A literary character could make the same argument to another and it would have the same validity.
Abstract and concrete are concepts for which I have found no fundamental means to distiguish without presupposing one or the other as more valid.
Put more simply: what would distingish an actual event from a 100% accurate simulation?
TheSameDonkey 1 year ago
@TheSameDonkey Our universe is concrete. It's tangible and has physical properties. That's the exact opposite of being abstract.
philochristos 1 year ago
I don't find his style of argumentation here very appealing, since our universe in and of itself may indeed be abstract in the same sense as "mathematical objects".
It does after all seem that the universe follows mathematical rules.
TheSameDonkey 1 year ago
Entropy can only be over come in open systems that allow information and energy in and out. There fore the Universe could not have any order with out an out side influence.
Howie47 1 year ago
I think he means just that...
What/whomever created matter/energy, space, and time must supersede all attributes of matter/energy, space, and time.
...because something that does not exist, cannot bring itself into existence through it's own means as said means don't exist if it does not exist....
aveyowyns 1 year ago
What do you think he means by "greater than the universe"?
Telos34 1 year ago