Perhaps, 0PsycoDad0, you can inform us just how the warming which ended the ice age, which, by the way, had most of North America under ice, came about? What caused the Earth to warm so much that all that ice to melt?
Then tell us how all the increased human and industrial activity brought about the "minor ice age" of the 1970's period which caused your wise, knowledgeable scientists to declare we were entering another ice age and could expect to freeze to death if something was not done?
@0PsycoDad0 I'm not sure what it means to "repead," but if you believe as you offer that "mistakes are no prof [sic] of anything, same counts for negative evidence," then perhaps you should reevaluate what side of the debate is hostile... the side pointing out the fallacious data, or the side saying "mistakes are no prof [sic] of anything." Me, I'll take actual data. Goodluck to you, sir. I hope you are able to pull the wool from your eyes one day soon.
@0PsycoDad0 I am referring to your near-religious zealotry defending a faulty science.Global Warming doesn't exist,so my coming up with a better theory on why it is occurring, when it isn't, is ludicrous.The Scientific Method, perhaps you've heard of it, doesn't encourage one to construct a model then search for or create (as NOAA has) fake data in order to justify the fallacious claims of those seeking to perpetuate a global carbon tax agenda.Me sources and facts, you ad hominem attacks,goodbye
Do you actually think THIS ONE example diminishes the gazzillion proven true statements science made?
What alternative explanantion do you have?
How does your alternative explains all the other evidence?
Which sources do you use?
"upon its altar"
WTF? This pathetic religion comparrison is not even naive it´s stupid! I´m tired to hear allways the same baseless fundie crap. It´s the same with evolution.
@EndNationStates Well "my own research" hardly includes some teraflop high end computer for modeling nor some blinky star-toy gathering data.
The common strategy of skeptics is to destroy the credibility of science&scientists involved. This has nothing to do with scientific proceedures but is entierely aimed at creating an air of doubt, mistrust and hostility.
As proponent of the scientific comunity i repead again; mistakes are no prof of anything, same counts for negative evidence!
Don't take my word for it.NOAA is telling you... All I'm telling you is that you shouldn't fall for every scheme that comes down the pike. Do Some of YOUR OWN Research!!!
World-renowned Canadian climatologist, Dr. Timothy Ball, admonished “At best the entire incident indicates gross incompetence, at worst it indicates a deliberate attempt to create a temperature record that suits the political message of the day.”Keep in mind, psyco,that you are basing your defense of global warming and the schemes justified upon its altar on a crumbling house of cards built with specious data.
@0PsycoDad0 NOAA-16,(launch Sept.00) follows a sun-synchronous orbit (102min duration) around the Earth gathering temperature data.For the past decade this satellite's data has been fed into climate computer models.All of the data has now been taken offline.NOAA's Program Coordinator, Chuck Pistis, admitted that the data was inaccurate showing temperatures 10-15 degrees higher than they were in reality.
Perhaps, 0PsycoDad0, you can inform us just how the warming which ended the ice age, which, by the way, had most of North America under ice, came about? What caused the Earth to warm so much that all that ice to melt?
Then tell us how all the increased human and industrial activity brought about the "minor ice age" of the 1970's period which caused your wise, knowledgeable scientists to declare we were entering another ice age and could expect to freeze to death if something was not done?
SenateCandidate 1 year ago
0PsycoDad0, you clearly have a problem. Ignorance can be cured, but, as you clearly demonstrate, stupidity cannot.
SenateCandidate 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0 I'm not sure what it means to "repead," but if you believe as you offer that "mistakes are no prof [sic] of anything, same counts for negative evidence," then perhaps you should reevaluate what side of the debate is hostile... the side pointing out the fallacious data, or the side saying "mistakes are no prof [sic] of anything." Me, I'll take actual data. Goodluck to you, sir. I hope you are able to pull the wool from your eyes one day soon.
EndNationStates 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0 I am referring to your near-religious zealotry defending a faulty science.Global Warming doesn't exist,so my coming up with a better theory on why it is occurring, when it isn't, is ludicrous.The Scientific Method, perhaps you've heard of it, doesn't encourage one to construct a model then search for or create (as NOAA has) fake data in order to justify the fallacious claims of those seeking to perpetuate a global carbon tax agenda.Me sources and facts, you ad hominem attacks,goodbye
EndNationStates 1 year ago
It´s allways attacking the method or the ppl involved. NEVER constructive critique.
NEVER bringing up some better working model/explanation!
Simple deranged personalities having no clue about WHAT THE F$%§ they´re talking!
Meddling their mumbo jumbo retard world view with what propelled the entire fu&%ing world out of intelectual darkness of moron ritualists!
So "endtimer" WHERE is your evidence?
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
@EndNationStates So what? ONE model is wrong...
Do you actually think THIS ONE example diminishes the gazzillion proven true statements science made?
What alternative explanantion do you have?
How does your alternative explains all the other evidence?
Which sources do you use?
"upon its altar"
WTF? This pathetic religion comparrison is not even naive it´s stupid! I´m tired to hear allways the same baseless fundie crap. It´s the same with evolution.
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
@EndNationStates Well "my own research" hardly includes some teraflop high end computer for modeling nor some blinky star-toy gathering data.
The common strategy of skeptics is to destroy the credibility of science&scientists involved. This has nothing to do with scientific proceedures but is entierely aimed at creating an air of doubt, mistrust and hostility.
As proponent of the scientific comunity i repead again; mistakes are no prof of anything, same counts for negative evidence!
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0
Continuation..........
Don't take my word for it.NOAA is telling you... All I'm telling you is that you shouldn't fall for every scheme that comes down the pike. Do Some of YOUR OWN Research!!!
EndNationStates 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0 Continuation...
World-renowned Canadian climatologist, Dr. Timothy Ball, admonished “At best the entire incident indicates gross incompetence, at worst it indicates a deliberate attempt to create a temperature record that suits the political message of the day.”Keep in mind, psyco,that you are basing your defense of global warming and the schemes justified upon its altar on a crumbling house of cards built with specious data.
Continued Below...
EndNationStates 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0 NOAA-16,(launch Sept.00) follows a sun-synchronous orbit (102min duration) around the Earth gathering temperature data.For the past decade this satellite's data has been fed into climate computer models.All of the data has now been taken offline.NOAA's Program Coordinator, Chuck Pistis, admitted that the data was inaccurate showing temperatures 10-15 degrees higher than they were in reality.
Continued below....
EndNationStates 1 year ago