Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

paul is dead - the rotten apple 67 O

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
10,774
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 1, 2008

subliminal pilgrim

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Its very simple. The real Paul died in 1966. A look-a-like was found and plastic surgry was done. You can see the 1967 Paul looks different and he kept getting more plastic surgry to look more and more like paul. The new Paul has a slightly better voice with more falsetto is how it was pulled off. He had the voice but couldnt play Bass, he could however play piano

  • It is amazing, when you look at it now. But back then information was controlled by a few powerful people. So if you were told "the world is flat" then you believed it. When Life magazine said "Paul is Dead" is just a hoaz, people believed it. The internet has opened up communication on a global level. People no longer trust or believe what the corporate media distributes as "truth."  People are starting to open their minds. It's a beautiful thing, indeed.

see all

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I saw many yesterday's videos of 1965 and there were at least two different Paul McCartney, perhaps there never was a real Paul.

  • @faulisdead Plus his music writing skills were less creative than before.

  • 9? why 9? Has anyone ever looked up something that happened on May 11,1966?

  • i think the whole thing is full of shit!!

  • @nikkeljoe i dont think it looks like him

  • So how come Paul McCartney's son looks like like young Paul? Did they use dead man's spunk?

  • @beachcomberbob Possibly. Good suggestion. So was it an oversight or deliberately in there? One way or another, many Masonic/Cultic references and CIA/Tavistock influencers were around (are around) these scenes. So many artists -- esp. then -- were trying to say things.

  • @PixieDust1996 No you don't. You think you do but if you don't understand that a) doubles have moments of sort of looking like the real deal or they wouldn't be doubles, yet doubles diverge radically in certain moments, & b) that there are song and storyline (e.g., "Free as a Bird" Beatles history video context), & statements (several) over the years ... then u don't realize yr arguments wld be good if ISOLATED, but your arguments are not from a vacuum. This argument is stronger. Unfortunately!

  • What are the extra code letters in the strip (black and white) which you so often show? I of course recognize the letters from the Lonely Hearts drum, but what are the others (s, b, c, etc.)? Thanks.

  • @rog944 Still is controlled by "a few" powerful people. Moreso (controlled, I mean), but more layers of controllers, too. As to "people not trusting" the mass messages, that's nonsense. They overall SAY they don't but don't accept good argument for waking up, and clear action plans, as much as they did then. So which is better? Lip service or real chance at cognizant awareness? Lennon could remind everyone in the Playboy interview about CIA/Army LSD & "window deaths". Not now. Think about it.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more