The great Orson Welles in one of his finest roles as the amoral Renaissance prince Cesare Borgia, in the 1949 film Prince of Foxes, in a scene about the power of seduction and the seductions of power.
The great Orson Welles in one of his finest roles as the amoral Renaissance prince Cesare Borgia, in the 1949 film Prince of Foxes, in a scene about the power of seduction and the seductions of power.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Tyrone Power was awed by the power of Orson in that scene, you can see it in his eyes. The appearance and voice--that was his best, the Third Man speech on the Circus Wheel was almost just as good.
Wonderful... a good example of how fine Welles the actor could be; although one can only imagine how visually superior the scene would have been had Welles also directed it! Failing that, there are the films he did direct, esp. Citizen Kane, Touch of Evil and Chimes at Midnight, which contain great and fully-realized Welles performances in the context of his own vastly imaginative directorial vision... which this film does not remotely approach.
There are those who say that Welles probably did have a hand in the direction of this film, as many of the show-offy, low-angle shots in Prince of Foxes are pretty Wellesian. Not to detract from Henry King's fine direction in this instance, however. Some critics still say that The Third Man was more Welles than Carol Reed in its direction, even to this day.
Idjitz, re "The Third Man," I agree with that. Check out the chase through the sewers in "Third Man," then look at the walking chase through the canals near the end of "Touch of Evil." Both show the same directorial hand. I don't see much sign of Welles the director in the scene posted here, but perhaps elsewhere in the film. Welles' style is only partly a matter of camera placement; his dynamic editing, pitting action against action, is central, I think, and appears designed into his shooting.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.