Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Stephen Schneider talks to 52 Climate Change Skeptics [PART 1]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,244
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 10, 2010

Professor Stephen Schneider fields concerns and misinformation from joe public.

----------------------------

The late Stephen Schneider was the Professor of Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies at Stanford University. An internationally recognised leader in research on climate change, he served as a consultant on the issue to every U.S. President from Nixon to Obama.

He was actively involved with the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change since its inception, and was among the group of scientists to receive the Nobel Prize for their work with the organisation. His commitment to improving public understanding of science through extensive public appearances continued right up until his death in July this year

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why is anyone listening to this rat? How dare he even mention tree ring data, when his mates at the IPCC have used this to come up with the infamous hockey stick, which was designed by Mann to fool everyone?

    How can he speak of calibrating tree ring or other proxy data with the temperature record, when his mates have eliminated data to "hide the decline" in another paper?

    Folks, do not bother with the IPCC report, which is mostly fiction; designed to fool you into taking massive personal changes

  • So they chose a bunch of 'sceptics' with no scientific backgrounds. It's amazing how these people operate.

  • @sydfly The reality of global warming / climate change is isn't hotly debated amongst scientific peers. What to do about it is. What the future hold is. Not the knowledge that adding CO2 to the atmosphere warms the atmosphere or to what degree it does.

  • Wow, a bunch of people with no scientific background got shown up by a scientist.....what did that prove?? Global warming/ climate change is still hotly debated amongst well informed scientific peers

  • This is embarrassing!!!

    In the left corner we have a train driver , a housewife, a 15yr old kid, builder and a cattle farmer... could we ever find a more hopeless bunch of people to discuss a scientific issue!!...

    In the right corner a Stanford professor with 40 years of experience

    Informational assymetry is so large here he could convince them the earth was hollow if he felt like it. its a set up and as someone trying to ascertain the truth I find this sickening

  • This is definitely one of the most impressive human beings ever to have graced the earth.

  • @socialretard28: Thank you so much for posting this....Don't know when you did this, but it sure is a great way to honor this guy. The world lost a great practical speaker on this subject. Keep up the good fight!

    Cheers

  • @chewbaca1989 Uh... What? I'm not picking sides, I did some research based on the specific topic. If you had bothered, you would have found that more studIES like this do exist, and are much more in-depth. (Forster and Gregory, 2006) (Murphy et al. 2009) Linden has a proven record of cherry-picking, you need to be sceptical of his work too, not just the other 98%.

  • @kellygiz

    Luck? Ha! Your a freakin' Globalist Hell spawn. You side right away with those misers critical of the study and discount it. Your response ought to be, if you had common sense, to have more study's like this that are "Global" in scope. But you default your world religion, go pay your tithe to mother earth. The wealthy will get dispensations by buying Carbon credits. What a freakin' scam.

  • @chewbaca1989 Yes, that is Lindzen. And that paper has been criticized by other sceptics, not to mention by the greater scientific community. Even sceptic Roy Spencer on november 2nd, 2009, published an article critical of his methods. Kevin Trenberth also commented in Jan 2010 on the paper's shortcomings. One of the big issues with that paper is that it was not looking at global data, it only looks at the tropics. This is GLOBAL warming after all.

    Nice try though. Better luck next time.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more