The interesting five at Orcop, Herefordshire
Loading...
627
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (timmeh1507)
see all
All Comments (5)
-
errr??
-
1: Barwell, Birmingham, 1907, 4.5 cwt
2: John Pennington I, Monmouth, 1663, 5 cwt 3:
Abraham Rudhall II, Gloucester, 1731, 5.75 cwt
4: John Pennington I, Monmouth, 1663, 5.25 cwt
5: John Pennington II, Monmouth, 1679, 10 cwt in B flat
-
very weird.... whats up with the tenor!
-
Very nice. I like unusual towers. Was it a g/f ring? What were they like to handle?
Loading...
don't sound very pleasent do they lol not bad though, part from that sharp tenor. I like bells tha you have to pull because then you have got more controll than ones you just give slight twitch and the bell rings it self
pal05pmajor3 2 years ago
I think the tone is remarkably clean for old bells it's just a shame about the tenor - though who knows if it's meant to be like that! And I agree about bells you have to pull, these won't ring themselves!
timmeh1507 2 years ago
They are a ground floor ring and aren't bad to handle, they go well but need a little more pull than normal!
timmeh1507 2 years ago