Thermodynamic Arguments for Creation by Thomas Kindell

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,983
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 29, 2007

Journal Censors 'Second Law' Paper Refuting Evolution
http://www.icr.org/article/6209/

"There is thus no justification for the view, often glibly repeated, that the Second Law of thermodynamics is only statistically true, in the sense that microscopic violations repeatedly occur, but never violations of any serious magitude. On the contrary, no evidence has ever been presented that the Second Law breaks down under any circumstances." *A.B. Pippard, Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics (1966), p. 100

"[A Law] is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premises, the more different are the kinds of things it relates, and the more extended its range of applicability. Therefore, the deep impression which classical thermodynamics made on me. It is the only physical theory of universal content which I am convinced, that within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts will never be over thrown." *Albert Einstein, quoted in *M.J. Klien, "Thermodynamics in Einstein's Universe, "in Science, 157 (1967), p. 509; also in *Isaac Asimov's Book of Science and Natural Quotations, p. 76.

"The Second law of thermodynamics predicts that a system left to itself will in the course of time, go toward greater disorder." *Harold Blum, Time's Arrow and Evolution (1968), pp. 201

"The greatest puzzle is where all the order in the universe came from originally. How did the cosmos get wound up, if the second law of thermodynamics predicts asymmetric unwinding toward disorder?" *Paul C.W. Davies (1979).

"The second law of thermodynamics not only is a principle of wide reaching scope and application, but also is one which has never failed to satisfy the severest test of experiment. The numerous quantitative relations derived from this law have been subjected to more and more accurate expermental investigation without the detection of the slightest inaccuracy." *G.N. Lewis and *M. Randall, Thermodynamics (1961), p. 87.

"My knowledge of thermodynamics has shown me that all mechanical systems (such as an engine or fridge or aeroplane etc.) require not only energy but ordered machinery in order to work. Thus simply adding energy to a lump of matter will not turn this into a machine which can do useful work. Clausius and other great thermodynamic scientists of the past, demonstrated this in the precise expression of the second law of thermodynamics which states that some of energy for useful work will in any system always be lost irretrievably. It has been argued that with an open system, useful energy can be put back in, but this will only be of use if there is an existing machine! One can never get round the 2nd law even for open systems. Working machinery or coded information (when dealing with digitally controlled machines such as in DNA) is always required before anything works."

Professor Andy C. McIntosh DSc, FIMA, C.Math, FEI, C.Eng, FInstP, MIGEM, FRAeS (Professor of Thermodynamics and Combustion Theory)


Quotes by Evolutionists Against Evolution
Appendix - http://www.warneveryone.com/appendix.htm

Live broadcasting
http://warnlive.com

Northwest Creation Network
23208 55th Ave W.
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
206-465-1635
contact@nwcreation.net
http://nwcreation.net/index.html

  • likes, 97 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @IAMsServant What science has come up with so far regarding biological evolution, can be tested and observed thanks to today's technology making the evidence more compelling than ever. Your claim to be scientifically literate yet not accept that nature phenomena happen under natural circumstances considering all environments are dynamic, simply shoots itself in the foot and scientifically speaking is not at all a noteworthy topic.

  • @XUltra00 @XUltra00 What hasn't been observed is a finch giving birth to anything but a finch, a turtle giving birth to anything but or a turtle which is what the ToE teaches. Can you show me how this can be tested and observed rather than speculated by changing beaks and shells etc?

see all

All Comments (585)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Luke 12:51 “Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you nay: but rather division” -- Yahshua Christ

  • Very disappointing video. Essentially no relation to the laws of thermodynamics. Very dull.

  • @44bobio ...No , you still are the IDIOT, didn't you noticed why I make notice that i said MAKE not PRODUCE... of course there are many ways to PRODUCE water, but to MAKE water by combining the 2 primary chemicals that compose it.. go back and read my reply, I clearly said MAKE water, not PRODUCE water, I know a lot of ways to produce it, I don't need you giving me yet another example, MORON..!!

  • @KeMoniito Your an idiot. How do you think a hydrogen fuel cell works, and the by product of the process is water. And guess what, God doesn't make them, Honda does. I can get you some literature if you like, otherwise i can find you a video with pretty colours.

  • @KeMoniito Don't know what drugs your on but it sounds like you think you just get 2 of these and 1 of those and hey presto you have water. Your not making hash cookies fool. Look into it

  • Antibiotic resistant Bacteria evolved to produce chemicals to stop the breakdown of their cell wall so how can one say evolution doesn't exist, we have this proof in 50 short years. Also the 2nd law of thermodynamics assumes a closed system, Earth is not a closed system as we get our energy from the sun so people should stop beating that drum.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more