Journal Censors 'Second Law' Paper Refuting Evolution
http://www.icr.org/article/6209/
"There is thus no justification for the view, often glibly repeated, that the Second Law of thermodynamics is only statistically true, in the sense that microscopic violations repeatedly occur, but never violations of any serious magitude. On the contrary, no evidence has ever been presented that the Second Law breaks down under any circumstances." *A.B. Pippard, Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics (1966), p. 100
"[A Law] is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premises, the more different are the kinds of things it relates, and the more extended its range of applicability. Therefore, the deep impression which classical thermodynamics made on me. It is the only physical theory of universal content which I am convinced, that within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts will never be over thrown." *Albert Einstein, quoted in *M.J. Klien, "Thermodynamics in Einstein's Universe, "in Science, 157 (1967), p. 509; also in *Isaac Asimov's Book of Science and Natural Quotations, p. 76.
"The Second law of thermodynamics predicts that a system left to itself will in the course of time, go toward greater disorder." *Harold Blum, Time's Arrow and Evolution (1968), pp. 201
"The greatest puzzle is where all the order in the universe came from originally. How did the cosmos get wound up, if the second law of thermodynamics predicts asymmetric unwinding toward disorder?" *Paul C.W. Davies (1979).
"The second law of thermodynamics not only is a principle of wide reaching scope and application, but also is one which has never failed to satisfy the severest test of experiment. The numerous quantitative relations derived from this law have been subjected to more and more accurate expermental investigation without the detection of the slightest inaccuracy." *G.N. Lewis and *M. Randall, Thermodynamics (1961), p. 87.
"My knowledge of thermodynamics has shown me that all mechanical systems (such as an engine or fridge or aeroplane etc.) require not only energy but ordered machinery in order to work. Thus simply adding energy to a lump of matter will not turn this into a machine which can do useful work. Clausius and other great thermodynamic scientists of the past, demonstrated this in the precise expression of the second law of thermodynamics which states that some of energy for useful work will in any system always be lost irretrievably. It has been argued that with an open system, useful energy can be put back in, but this will only be of use if there is an existing machine! One can never get round the 2nd law even for open systems. Working machinery or coded information (when dealing with digitally controlled machines such as in DNA) is always required before anything works."
Professor Andy C. McIntosh DSc, FIMA, C.Math, FEI, C.Eng, FInstP, MIGEM, FRAeS (Professor of Thermodynamics and Combustion Theory)
Quotes by Evolutionists Against Evolution
Appendix - http://www.warneveryone.com/appendix.htm
Live broadcasting
http://warnlive.com
Northwest Creation Network
23208 55th Ave W.
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
206-465-1635
contact@nwcreation.net
http://nwcreation.net/index.html
@IAMsServant What science has come up with so far regarding biological evolution, can be tested and observed thanks to today's technology making the evidence more compelling than ever. Your claim to be scientifically literate yet not accept that nature phenomena happen under natural circumstances considering all environments are dynamic, simply shoots itself in the foot and scientifically speaking is not at all a noteworthy topic.
XUltra00 1 year ago 5
@XUltra00 @XUltra00 What hasn't been observed is a finch giving birth to anything but a finch, a turtle giving birth to anything but or a turtle which is what the ToE teaches. Can you show me how this can be tested and observed rather than speculated by changing beaks and shells etc?
thelordssoldier83 8 months ago 2