Cambrian Explosion *vs* Evolution
Uploader Comments (HighFlyingDutchman)
Top Comments
-
50 Million years is hardly 'suddenly', even on an evolutionary timescale. And what they forget to mention is that the Cambrian Explosion happened ALL under water. No land-dwellers where present during or at the end of it, they all evolved later on.
It was simply the result of 3 billion years of life evolving: after passing a certain threshold things excellerated.... and many species where short lived, replaced by better suited ones... just like evolution predicts...
-
Actually PE doesn't describe rapid evolution. It describes different modes of speciation which can reflect in the fossil record as abrupt appearances.
And the Cambrian can best be described as an era where the phenomenon of fossilization became a much more probable event since this is when hard bodies and skeletons made their first appearances out of the simpler soft bodied types. These superior body plans became established and it's been an evolutionary arms race ever since.
All Comments (101)
-
sponges are relatively uncommon in the fossil record owing to their delicacy.
-
@simpsonmark That already refuted. We have found many sponge embryo fossil. If a sponge fossil can be found, we should found fossilized animal if they are exist before cambrian. but they don't. Cambrian is really an explosion. from all one cellular organism then suddenly to all phyla.
-
@Goddaimn Considering the time it took for other organisms to evolve throughout Geological time scale 20 years is nothing!
-
From nothing we have something. BS statement. There was life before the Cambrian. It was small and soft bodied. life got bigger and hard bodied in the Cambrian and that is why we can find it fossilised.
-
Evolution is usually 'slow' but can be 'boosted' at times especially (but not only) after extinction events.
-
You can't put newspaper articles in school science textbooks.
-
This programme is a disgrace as are the ideas beind it. These people what you to live in a theocracy.
-
no biologist worth weight in salt would state "from nothing came everything."
from little came a lot is more in line with data.
it does make sense that cambrian fossils are harder to find ,based on their anatomy. a lil research won't kill you, don't let the sammuel jackson narrator do all the thinking for you. ;-)
-
I think modern biologists should start demanding their money back from their SO CALLED prestigious universities FOR TEACHING THEM REDICULOUS LIES!!!
Ah, ColdWaterMedia, the lying scum who brought us Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Ben Steins propaganda piece, voted the worst "documentary" of 2008, even by thinking theists.
.
It is gratifying to see that only a handful of people watch this crap whereas videos on evolution science, and science in general, get tens of thousands of views. Yay reason.
Noisegator 1 year ago 3
@Noisegator
thats sad,isnt it?
billions of people believe in nonsense stuff blindly in order to go to "heaven" or just to follow their parents and when in the end some of them realize how illogical what they are doing is,they are called rational
in fact people who realize the absurdity of the Bible and leave Christianity are indeed rational people and they reach a "crossroad" and some choose the path of another insane idea,and some choose the guidance from their Owner...
respects anyway...
HighFlyingDutchman 1 year ago
I can see this video is for the highly retarded creationists that constantly lie and refuse to see with any clarity. They twist the meanings of the bible to their liking.
Evolutionists don't need faith they have fucking science you dumb fucking idiots you cannot refute science you fucking sheep!
Oxygen caused the mass of life oxygen that wasn't there before that built up over billions of years from the algae that was floating on the oceans. Without the oxygen ther was no complex life, u cocks!
skagman76 1 year ago 3
@skagman76
the story that a zombie retarded bacteria made you in billions of years after uncontrolled mutations and some more coincidences is the most unscientific claim the history of science has seen,it is a poor philosophy that the atheists have to believe,which is impossible times impossible according to maths and OBJECTIVE biology rules
i am not a christian btw
and you are free what to believe
peace
HighFlyingDutchman 1 year ago