X-Plane Bird Strike

A bird strike simulated on X-Plane with front landing gear damaged. That's what you can't do with MS Flight Simulator.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• xplane
• x-plane
• birdstrike
• accident
• collision
• airplane
• bird
• damage
• landing
• land
• emergency
• flight
• simulator
• fs2004
• fsx
• fs9
• flightsimulator
• crash
• aviation
• planecrash

[xXMaFabXx]

what airport is this?

[bachian]

SBSP - Congonhas - Brazil

[LH164]

Alright well obviously Microsoft simulators like FSX are superior. Why else would Jeppesen, Boeing, Cessna, AOPA, and so on sponsor FSX? And why wld 99% of all virtual airlines support MFS and most addons on the internet. Exactly.

[bachian]

Only X-Plane is FAA-Certified. For Microsoft, Flight Simulator is on game category.

[LH164]

alright maybe x-plane has this. but FSX and FS2004 are so much professional thats why everyone with virtual airlines uses it! Notice how your plane spun around - exactly not too realistic. I would rather have better planes, graphics, and everything else than a birdstrike option ha

[bachian]

Look my other videos and you will see that's not because it has bird strikes that it's more realistic than FS.

[Tubewaytorpedo]

@panton41

Dont forget the new Microsoft Flight that is coming out!

[dynamite846]

i feel bad for the bird

[BlossomsSakuraCherry]

Pilot stunt guy drifter

[panton41]

MSFS is no longer under development. X-Plane is. That pretty much settles the argument about what's better. Unless MSFT resurrects the development team FS X will become more and more outdated to the point of irrelevancy.

X-Plane 10 is set to come out in March/April 2011 and looking to have graphics that put FS X to shame.

[planecrazy101ya]

X Plane sucks- it's official...

[CmdrGendoIkari]

@LH164 - For the record, Boeing and Cessna have both officially licenced aircraft models made for X-Plane.

[CmdrGendoIkari]

You gotta love the neverending X-Plane versus MSFS arguments. I've used both. I'll stick with the one that actually simulates real aerodynamic behavior, and doesn't require a supercomputer to run smoothly.

[Aviator14]

I don't see how X-plane can be so real if you can fly through buildings and trees, in MSFS you actually collide with them just like in real life. Also I have never seen any 747's in real life that can land, takeoff, and stay afloat in the water like they can in X-plane. I don't understand why the FAA would certify something that fake. Also how an A-380 can handle like an F-16 and do 2 barrel rolls per second and still fly, in real life the A-380 would rip apart.

[scaremengaviation]

@bachian X-Plane seems to be more physics-inclined, focused on the dynamics of flight. It's quite obvious that FSX focuses more on eye-candy.

[magicpowification]

FSX is vastly inferior to x-plane. The flight performance is just cheesy in FSX.