glenn sacks
Uploader Comments (mathewskarl)
Top Comments
-
GLEN SACKS is the best, I get his newsletter, it is amazing what fathers go through even when the mother is so wrong. We need equal rights for fathers.
-
Gleen Sacks rocks!
All Comments (68)
-
Glenn Sacks is a REAL man who stands up for truth and justice; despite the resistance he meets in this backward, misandric, and irrational American society.
-
@CyberBlondeY2K First off, your statement is already biased, you quickly established that those husbands were seen as bad guys( younger women? Come on now). The trend is that more women initiated the divorce and left men paying in more than one ways. But I agree that the kids are the ones suffering. But no all this lady did was some kind of revenge towards men. Just look at the "don't date him" website type of ideas... women=victims=sympathy...that'
s what sells to the public!! -
Women are the biggest dead beats. They kill their children from abortion. So why dont they put the moms on pizza box. Then the woman talks about why did you bring a baby in the world. Its not a mans choice to bring a baby in the world its womens. Women don't care or think all of the factors through when bring a baby into this world. I dont think any of "deadbeat dads" planned on seperating from the girlfriend/wife.
-
Glenn owns everyone in the stage...SAD that they dont give a crap about dads getting to see theie children..
-
I've seen a woman with 5 children by 5 different dads. She's never worked a day in her life! She has a very nasty, arrogant attitude. She lives in an upper-middle class neighborhood, in her own home with her boyfriend du jour. She leases her luxury SUV, and rotates out of one and gets a new one every year! Tell me what's wrong with this picture.
-
so they rather get the money from a man who doesnt even see the kids... why not just get a job and pay for your decision to have the child on your own? i want to see more women paying child support if they cant offord the child alone then give it to the parent that CAN. or better yet howabout trying to keep dad in the childs life instead of moving to another state so u can collect a firggin check and he cant see his kid!
-
is it just me who can't hear anything when they talk over each other
-
Mathewkarl is spot on, its potential earnings and NOT REAL income, and its the same in Australia. My income was 11k gross, yet I have to pay child support on potential earning of 40k net income (thats 55k gross). Its the only Corporation that can use this method, there is something morally and legally wrong with this to say the least. I cant go buy anything anywhere if i say I have POTENTIAL money in my wallet/pocket, so how can these fuckers, its nothing to do with support and all about a scam
-
More proof that young men should never marry or have children. Seriously guys, don't to it or you will be spending the rest of your life dealing with the disgusting mentality of the women in this video.
-
@mathewskarl thats true it is based on not only what you make but what they think you could so if you dont have a degree yet they think you could earn more then a scientist they make you pay accordingly wich is retarted that they can get away with that line of thinking
child support is calculated by income, so if the woman earns more than the man, guess what she pays more, and if the man has no income, he does not have to pay
thefutureboom 2 years ago
that's b/s.
It's based on 'potential income' - not real income. They look at what you MAY earn and base it accordingly (in the US at least). In England, it is a combination of a percentage of the real income and how many children you are disallowed a relationship with.
mathewskarl 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have a few friends whose husbands left them for younger women, no baggage. These are Dead Beat Dads who work under the table to avoid paying for the offspring they helped produce. I think if anyone, the IRS would love to find them! I feel terrible for the dads who are taken advantage of by greedy women who marry for money and have kids to get support, but sadly it seems more often than not, this is not the case. And who loses? The kids. Heartbreaking! I think what this lady did was justice.
CyberBlondeY2K 3 years ago
Really now... Although no-one in their right mind would claim no deatbeats exist, it is nowhere near to 'more often than not'. More often than not, father's cannot 'afford' to pay as their C$A claims are based on 'potential income' not 'actual' income... See the difference?
A man can potentially earn $50k (for example), judge orders 1/3 of that to be C$A. Back in 'reality', same man is earning $22k. Also, just like the women - men may also become part of a new family, and needs to account them.
mathewskarl 3 years ago 5