Death of the Reich and Beyond 1 of 13

This is a documentary compilation covering the last days of the Third Reich and some of the immediate aftermath of World War II. It is not an incredibly in-depth series, but it does touch on some of the decisions and consequences of this war that are not typically covered. This series documents the intentional bombing of civilian targets by Allied Forces, the employment of Nazi scientists by Allied nations after the war, the trial at Nuremberg, and the massive stores of looted art and money hidden by the Nazis.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ww2
• world
• war
• nazi
• hitler
• germany
• poland
• ussr
• russia
• soviet
• union
• america
• usa
• britain
• uk
• france

[HYHK]

Stalin cut a deal with Hitler at that stage of the war? Get Real, Not a chance in Hell. Typical American, take all the credit, self-glorification nonsense by Ambrose.

[Kralhonj]

Shit doc, any doc that uses pseudo historians like Stephen Ambrose will always be a joke.

"Stalin may have cut a deal with the Nazis"

Utter bollocks without any basis in fact. Stalin had amassed 13 armies on the Polish border. At that point in the war, with or without the Brits/U.S the Russians would have contiued and won against the Germans.

[trupoed7]

classic anti-russian bullshit

[patsyd80]

People talk shit about the Russians but Im pretty sure us and the Americans could not have defeat Germany. I mean when you think about the battles on the eastern front makes the Normandy landings like a cake walk.

[martynrobin121]

@HYHK Hitler did cut a deal with Stalin in 1939, Adolf Hitler invited Communism into Europe as Allies, The Nazis and Communist invaded nations as friends and had victory parades, The Soviets supplied the Nazis with resources,supplies to use against the Allies, There were even Soviet supplies used in Operation Barberossa, The Soviets were invaded with the Axis using Soviets supplies!!!

[23Henrich]

@why2lie Godwin's Law has been proven again and again on any on-line discourse re: World War 2. As time goes on the likelihood of being accused of being a 'Nazi' increases simply b/c you disagree with someone or the 'official version' of the war as written by the Allies. Calling someone a 'Nazi' is like calling them ''ugly": it isn't a logical argument and it doesn't solve a damn thing. It's immature and extremely lame. Try exercising some logic instead of obstructing debate.

[Walkingzombi]

Hitler ist ein dickhead

[why2lie]

@Hexachloraphine Which side of history are you on? There are two kinds of men on this earth...which are you? Good or evil? Allies or Axis?

[Hexachloraphine]

@why2lie

Anti-intellectuals such as yourself (who unfortunately seem to be growing in numbers these days) are precisely what led to the horrors of Nazi Germany in the first place,

randypan71's comment made perfect sense to me.

Pray do tell us which parts of randypan71's comment are not plain English, in comparison to yours, replete with lol's and omg's.

[niceguyFTW]

@somethingxbeyond Good luck on your work. I'm sure Hitler will be proud of you.

[why2lie]

@randypan71 You should keep everything simple and use plain English...lol. If you tried too hard to sound educated, you'd confuse yourself...omg teacher.

[randypan71]

@why2lie you are obviously unaware of the differences between explaining evil and defending evil. I am EXPLAINING the rise of the fascistic empire states NOT defending them. My previous comments about the expulsion of eastern europe's germans was an analogy to the comment nietzsche made..."he who destroys monsters should see he does not become a monster himself"...which is exactly what the western allies became when the help organise the largest forced migration in human history.