Star Trek sequel by J.J. Abrams - Star Trek 2?
Top Comments
All Comments (19)
-
i like the lens flairs i hope he dose it agin make it seem realer kinda and i like the look of the new ship better the beige was a nice touch seemed a lot cleaner
-
Stop the numbering sequence and call it Star Trek Pooh
-
More like doing 10000 rpms
-
"Star Trek III - The search for Spock" AGAIN. That would merge both realities.
-
stupid!!!!!!
-
The 'reboot' or remaking of Star Trek should be compared to the different eras of Batman... the campy series ofthe 60s, to the interesting drama of Tim Burton, to the recent Dark Knight. Redoing it shouldn't take away from previous stories, in fact updated modern stories and technical effects can only add to the legacy.
-
It can be easy to get caught up in a whole host of scenario's, how does this new continuity effect the movie era stuff of the eighties and nineties and the TNG era? has that all seized to exist? technology is clearly far ahead of where its supposed to be at this point in the timeline! the bridge of the new Enterprise reminds me of the time ship relativity which is supposed to be from the 29th century.
-
The first Abram's Star Trek movie basically establishes a new continuity it makes you wonder how it affects the whole star trek universe, there's nothing stopping a future director from treating this continuity like the mirror universe and returning to the "prime continuity"
-
yes thank you for saying so, although im sure they hear us and dont care wat we real think as long as main stream morons eat it up they will keep serving up the crap just like music & the american car all crap & people are still eating it up makes me sick, sad day for Gene indeed
@BondFreek i think if JJ gets in it will be Wrath of the Lens Flares :D
ThatsMrFrank 1 year ago 6
BondFreek 2 years ago 5