Seven Unanswered Questions About 9/11, Part 2 of 2
Top Comments
All Comments (116)
-
@SprayOClockNews Some people talk like they're dealing with their own set of facts.Even if it were true that 767's did have transmitter/receiver packages, a 767 still cant fly 420 knots at 700 feet. So we're right back at the beginning of the tape where we ask the question: How can a 767 fly 420 knot at 700 feet?
-
@Daddyo930 YOU TELL EM DADDYO!!!! hats off to ya bro!
-
@belowthepovertyline Really, my mom recognizes my voice right after I say "hello... I guess she has two sons called Mark. The other explanation is that she rarely hears from him and he knew she would not recognize him. Thanks for the explanation.
-
@reinharv There was a reason for that, and there are videos explaining it. They had two different last names, and the mother said it was standard for him to identify himself as Mark Bingham. Whether you believe it or not is another matter.
-
and a life
-
@belowthepovertyline Yo! Fuck a blog. Look at Boeing's information in the 911 commission report asshole. They plainly state that they had no cell phone transmitter/receiver packages in their planes as of 2001. You don't know what your talking about moron. Get a life and a fuckin clue.
-
@Daddyo930 OK, before I go: I'm sure you won't visit a site that would have evidence against your claim, but the section at 911blogger on DRG and his claims about the seat back phones contains a huge amount of information about them, and that part of it is NOT in blog format and is NOT written as an emotion-driven us/them (conspiracy/non-conspiracy) tirade. Second, a cell phone tower is what you'll normally see on a mountain, not in a plane's nose. Third, insults are not a good argument. Bye.
-
@belowthepovertyline I deal with facts and numbers, not blogs and their bullshit. As of 2001, Boeing did not have cell phone towers in the 767 and 757 model. The communications package was added after 2001. A transmitter/receiver dish, fitted into the nose of the aircraft. Now get lost with your bullshit. Waste of time.
-
@Daddyo930 Oh, but I have. And of course Boeing didn't have cell phone towers in their models. They'd be kind of a tight fit.
-
@belowthepovertyline I told you to google that shit. Boeing did not have cell phone towers in their 767 or 757 model in 2001. Now get lost.
OMFG... the Japanese are doing a full blown investigation about the questions.... the damn U.S.A isnt doing squat about it... hmmmm, this really opened my eyes,
Shame on you Bush, omg "Sarah Pailan'? (you gotta be kidding!) Chaney and all the rest of you blowhards that took the American people lives into yall own hands,,, and used them at your own extent! the damn building evaporated along with those poor souls in WTC 1, 2 , & 7???, and the U.S is spending trillions dollars a day on crap?????
FelicityGemini 2 years ago 5
I actually LIVE in NY, Merlin. I saw the people walking home that day covered in white soot/powder, crying and stunned and talking about having heard explosions. In March of 2002, after Guiliani put up those two lights, we drove out there and it was STILL smoking.
You're a tourist, arguing GWB's legacy, I care because people got killed that day. Get real, nut job.
Thefameprince 2 years ago 4