cse 104 class 10 part 10-11 What about the red sea crossing,why don't they find any evidence of the entire Egyptian army drowning? part 2,,what is the unicorn?,wisdom teeth prove evolution?

Kent Hovind

Category:

Education

Tags:

• kent
• hovind
• jesuslostchildren777

[cptblade16]

All the evolutionsist need to see this video ... this guy rocks! I love all the findings.

[TheSaviouroftheworld]

@Eye2EyeIIIV Thanks for sending me to this video - Unicorns, maybe? But not the flying one horned horse type. That makes more sense.

[paulokas69]

Jabal al-Lawz means "mountain of almonds", you dumbass.

[357MagnumBob]

Everyone: think! Ex 14:21-The LORD drove the sea back WITH A STRONG EAST WIND and turned it into dry land. 900 feet? Just because the center of the shallower spot is now 900 ft underwater doesn't mean it was then. If North America was then under a vast ice sheet, sea level would have been lower, allowing this x-ing (and colonization of N America across what is now the Bearing Sea). It may also be the shallow spot didn't drop down as far then. We only can observe what it looks like now.

[lizazoon]

Out of the JEWISH POST:--When we deal with the Exodus, we basically have one account-the Torah's. .When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing. But . . .

The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it

-- End of quote

[AgApE010]

@Eye2EyeIIIV

-

"mass-erotic"? Anyways, it doesn't matter where the manuscript was found; whether in a trash can or underground, it doesn't change its value and reliability. The fact is that these manuscripts are much older than the TR. And there certainly is no evidence of "tampering" or it being "messed with". You're making that up and I'm willing to bet you have done no real research on textual criticism in order to even speak intelligently on such things.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@lizazoon

I can provide u with empirical evidence that the Exodus & Mt Sinai are an historical account. U have a choice after that. U can continue to think u fool someone that your atheism is supportable & that evolutionism is scientific & remain a denialist, or u can question all that u have been taught since u were in kindergarten & begin seeking the truth.

Your statement that it is fact is an example of precisely the same kind of lies u were spoon-fed in school all of your life.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@AgApE010

KJV is based on the received text which is based on the majority of all Bible supporting Greek manuscripts {95%} of about 5,200 pieces & the mass-erotic Hebrew text which is different than the new bibles which r based on the Sinaiticus & Vaticanus & Alexandrenus which r totally tampered with & messed with & changed & corrected many times. One was found in the pope's library another was found in the garbage can in a monastery which were the Egyptian Alexandrian type. Worthless

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@lizazoon

So what?

G-d's Word & honest archeology are the judge, not majority opinion.

[lizazoon]

@Eye2EyeIIIV Did you read the top comment ? When the american claim there was no president called Judas, are the Europeans going to argue that ?  When the jews say there is no evidence for the Exodus, why do christians even try to dispute it. It first of all their business.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

@lizazoon

you didn't watch the whole thing

[lizazoon]

Quote from The JEWISH POST About the Exodus, We basically have one account-the Torah's. When it comes to the historical analysis of the Exodus, we have only one account, and asserting the historical validity of an event that took place 3500 years ago on the basis of a single account does not put you on very solid historical footing.

The Exodus is not about history; it is about faith. If we could "prove" it, we would not need to have faith in it..-- End of quote