NephilimFree; Typical Creationist Liar 4 - Marc Surtees 1
Uploader Comments (JRChadwick)
Top Comments
-
Oh dear, oh dear oh DEAR!
I didn't realise we had people like this here in the UK, I thought it was just an American problem. He's like the British Kent Hovind...
PS. Great vid, but "Reading" is pronounced "Redding" (Gotta love English...!)
-
I've never doubted the existence of British imbeciles. We Americans gratefully remember King George III's idiocy quite well! ;)
All Comments (151)
-
@arayalrio Yes, they do: Spain and Japan do not actually exist. It is all just a big conspiracy.
-
From 2 people to 6 billion? Dude, how long until severe birth defects?
-
@mehja1 Oh...my......thinking organ HURTS.
I never realized I wasted so much time with those biology, chemistry and physics classes in college. Are my Spanish and Japanese teachers deceiving me too?? 8(
-
"Tell me: Where are all the bodies that should have piled up since the stone age? And please, don't embarrass yourself with such evilutionists arguments like: bodies are biodegradable!"
-
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Ah, I misread. Apologies for the time waste.
-
@labrat1807 evolutionism not evolutionist. There is no such thing "evolutionism". I doubt anyone with education will say "evolutionism". However there is a word "evolutionist". And the word is acceptable.
-
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner I used to hate the term "evolutionist", but now I accept it as a term that distinguishes me from both creationists and professional scientists. I feel the term "rationalist" does not apply to everyone who does not doubt evolution, as many just don't really think about it. The more I hear the term, the more I like it. I'm an evolutionist and damn proud of it. Of course should evolution be falsified (vanishingly unlikely) I will renounce the title.
-
@maxpolaris99 It seems George is a name given to idiots on both side of the pond :)
-
I hate people who say "evolutionism" they imply evolution as a belief system. i.e. neph
-
@biggingeryeti I like your answer and agree with most of it. I'm not convinced that all scientific scams have been revealed yet though. Mm.... Let me think about that for a while and we'll see what evolves!
Questioning someone's scientific qualifications isn't a valid argument. They are, after all presenting the findings of scientists.
It's a bit like saying that 911 didn't happen because the news reporter who presented it on CNN wasn't a qualified terrorist.
redsky 1 year ago
@redsky It is valid when someone is displaying virtually no knowledge regarding the topics he supposedly studied. And in the video "Marc Surtees 2 - Addendum", I confirmed all of his educational qualifications.
JRChadwick 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why the difference between HOW an atheist debunks a theist and a theist debunking an atheist, in case of similar grade of errs.
Even if atheists are right, they're usually extremely arrogant and "ad hominim".
Smug accidents of nature...
Jer0mmel 2 years ago
Did I insult Surtees? Yes. If someone is being an idiot, I will tell them. How can anyone use the human population growth argument with a straight face? However, an ad hominid attack would require that I replace a rebuttal with insults. I did not.
Now, point out where I claimed "accidents of nature" as a solution?
JRChadwick 2 years ago 2
I would LOVE to know what Surtees' graduate work was about. From what I can see in this video alone, he is chemically free of critical thinking.
photodube 2 years ago 2
Check the second video on him. I noted it in the side bar.
JRChadwick 2 years ago