Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The world should adopt our plan... part 2 negative case

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
234 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 31, 2008

The world should adopt our plan to significantly combat climate

Negative case

The negative case
As the negative team we do not agree with way of solving of problem by the afirmative team. We dont agree that the recycling is good step to take when the situation is so serious. Recycling is not effective enought. Recyling does not solve the status quo, but it only delies it. Recyclation is very expensive, in some cases even more than making the product from new materials.If it cosi x to deliver newly manufactored plastic to the market, for example, but it costi 10 x to deliver recicled plastic to the market, we can conclude the resources required to recyicle plastic are ten times more scare then the resources required to make plastic from scratch.And because recycling is suposed to be about the conservation of resources, mandating recycling under those consequences will do more harm than good. Also, for the recycling we need more energy, and making of this energy is poluting the planet. When recycling, except the wanted material, we get toxic materials too, for example, then recycling the paper, we get toxic sludge. Companies that create papers also plant trees and it¨s not in thein ineterest to plant trees when they dont need new raw materials. So basiclly, the number of cut trees is the same as the number of planted trees.Actualy,w hen it come to plastic, more of it is sent to China to be recycled and souch recycling cost more CO2 emision then simply burning it.By this we have shown that this is not more effictive way to save the earth.
The better way to solve this problem is by cutting our emisions.This is better because basicly we dont need any new resources.We dont have any harrmful by products. We save enegy just like we save money. For example , saving light bulb,use 13W of energy while regular use 60W. We can save energy by switching the light when we leave the room. Also,we can establish day, when we not driving the cars but we will drive bycicles, because its good for health and our viorment, fridge keep open for a lonk time,.. Another thing that people should heve on mind is that, deodorants destroy ozon,so is beter to use parfums in spray.Cutting emisions is better then recycling because:1.We dont have anny bad side efects 2.We saving energy and money.3. Personal comfort is on same level in our plan like in afirmace case.And after all,WE ARE SAVING OUR PLANET!!!!

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • nice argument about recycling, but cutting emissions, although certainly better and necessary, does not solve the problem, it reduces the problems and it's rate of growth, it doesn't end it.

    Don't know if you're making more videos but if you want someone to edit your english translations I'd be happy too, just PM me.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more