Has history been tampered with? Pharao,Moses,David,Solomon,Jesus relate to Middle Ages

Has history been tampered with? We are accustomed quite well to thinking that the events described in the Bible - and especially in the Old Testament - date back to an epoch so distant that it can hardly be called "historical" in the usual sense.
CLICK ON AMAZON LINK!
We seem to know everything there is to know about these times and these characters, in particular that most of them date to epochs preceding the new era by a couple of millennia, and that the events described in the Bible took place in and around the Middle East for the most part.

Could all of what we know be untrue? The big news is that it can, and is - the extensive research conducted by numerous Biblical scholars notwithstanding. Although the good faith of the latter can be doubted in quite a few cases, even the most scrupulous of scientists who ever had to tackle the gigantic array of data contained in the Bible were basing their research on the existing chronology - too obvious and self-implying to strike anyone as untrue. The sole exception to this is a group of mathematicians who have used the newest statistical methods to analyze the Bible from an altogether different standpoint, having revised the consensual chronology completely prior to that.

The results are astonishing to say the least. We learn that the Biblical Jerusalem was in fact located on the Bosporus and known as Constantinople and that the Biblical kingdoms of Israel and Judah can be identified as the mediaeval Roman Empire - the familiar characters transform into their mediaeval doppelgangers which are a lot less familiar to us but known quite well to historians. And it is from the part of the historians that we hear the loudest and most indignant criticisms of the new research - a touch too loud, perhaps, and with too many ad hominem accusations scattered here and there for us to declare the new chronology a blatant and unscientific lie the way they urge us to. There's just too much vitriol and a surprising paucity of actual academic argumentation.

The book of the mathematician Anatoly Fomenko may well be considered a revolution waiting to happen - but only if we let it to. Sheer force of habit and the all too human reluctance to question the "obvious" may render the most sensational and explosive results of scientific research null and void. No one likes a revolutionary, they're too much trouble, and whether or not they might in fact be right has got absolutely nothing to do with anything at all. Historians know history better than mathematicians, don't they? Pass the crisps.

"History: Fiction or Science?" - Challenge to traditional history.

Is it possible that Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were invented during Renaissance? Can it be that Jesus Christ was born in 1053 AD and crucified in 1086 AD? Scientific research points to the evidence that many modern beliefs of traditional history are a sham.

"History: Fiction or Science?" by the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues crowns 30 years of meticulous and extensive research. It is the first volume in seven comprising a "Chronology" that exposes numerous questionable notions of traditional history.

"History: Fiction or Science?" describes how the contemporary chronological scale was created and by whom, with the culprits named as the 16th 17th century clergy. The well-known model of history has enjoyed the relentless attention of prominent critics ever since its creation including respected people like Sir Isaac Newton and Jean Hardouin, the court librarian of Louis XIV, the Sun King of France.

Anatoly Fomenko dissects every historical age scrupulously and analyzes the data from every angle imaginable. Roman and Egyptian chronology take a good beating. Poggio Bracciolini and Petrarch take the blame for creating the beautiful legend of a mythical Classical age that never was.

The Biblical events are brought a lot closer to us both historically and geographically. The Biblical Jerusalem is actually the medieval city of Constantinople. The New and the Old Testament swap their positions in chronological order and are shown to refer to medieval events.

Using astronomy and statistics to back his theories, Fomenko delivers an abundant astronomical proof showing that the identified dates of 'ancient' eclipses are blatantly untrue. Fomenko explains the confusion between the Antiquity and the Middle Ages, and how the division between the two is merely imaginary. The book contains in-depth descriptions of the research methods used as well as the most meticulous rendition of the global chronological map with its numerous errors and glitches explained in a very level-headed manner. One doesn't have to be a mathematician to comprehend Fomenko's presentation.

"History: Fiction or Science?" transforms history from fiction into a rocket science. It is a must read for everyone who isn't entirely indifferent to human history and possibly also for those who are.

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

• Pharao
• Moses
• David
• Solomon
• Jesus
• Middle
• Ages
• painting
• paint
• castle
• palace
• river
• babylon
• human
• geography
• clock
• time
• measure
• astrology
• gods
• english
• apocalypse
• apostle
• greek
• roman
• egyptian
• manuscript
• book
• monument
• art
• writing
• house
• building
• forum
• latin
• sham
• catholic
• protestant
• service
• religion
• pope
• cult
• genghis
• khan

[CombustableHuxtable]

I take it this goes for Muhammad too? So the quran is also a middle-ages fabrication? Please tell me, I want to know because I don't want to go to hell! hahahaha allah says "Of a surety they will not believe, no matter how much you warn them!"

[mithec]

8. That the history of religions runs as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the XI century and JC), Bacchic Christianity (XI-XII century, before and after JC), JC Christianity (XII-XVI century) and its subsequent mutations into Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, and Islam;

[KalleRedson]

riduclous.

First,carbon14 dating prooves the age of al these documents. As if people in the 16th century had the SLIGHTEST knowledge of radioactivuty and forged it..right!

yea everyone can show us nice graphs, i want proof.

I guess the pope must have had the muslims in on the hoax as well, making them build roman temples and churches in the middle east which was in muslim hands by the 11th century.

RIDICULOUS.. aka america

[mithec]

Fomenko also alleges undue cooperation between physicists and archaeologists in obtaining the dates, since most radiocarbon dating labs only accept samples with an age estimate suggested by historians or archaeologists. Fomenko also claims that carbon dating over the range of 0 to 2000 AD is inaccurate because it has too many sources of error that are either guessed at or completely ignored, and that calibration is done with a statistically meaningless number of samples.

[greg12145]

@KalleRedson It's very plausible. You just have to look at the OFFICIAL 9/11 REPORT. If you've done your homework it's obvious it's a book with some truth and MANY, MANY, MANY DISTORTIONS of what really happened. So it's being done today - FABRICATING REALITY in books like the above, I guess it couldn't happen in the past.

[greg12145]

@KalleRedson It's very plausible!

[greg12145]

@silverbackman If the Elites/Ancient Educated/Royals are all connected and have been, why would it be hard... our top leaders all get together today... they didn't back then through proxy (messengers) means?

[greg12145]

@sweetsabrina23 Well, maybe historians are all playing the game... like a group of Poker people/buds - wink, wink! I doubt a historian would want to step on the toes of his colleagues selling and teaching historical material. There probably have, and have been silenced or work terminated. What exactly would a Historian be skilled at in that profession (not much other than being a Historian).

[greg12145]

@feeefyefofuuum So do you believe the OFFICIAL 9/11 REPORT? That will be a main part of history taught in the future - do you understand! Fomenko might not be off - it's all a SCAM! The hardest part is accepting that you've been lied to (like a cheating spouse... you might live in denial at first, but later accept the reality that you were lied to/dishonoured). I bet you're young, and I bet all the people here saying it's BS are young - I bet you'll get a different answer from the aged-IM 43

[greg12145]

@KalleRedson You just have to look/read at the OFFICIAL 9/11 REPORT and know how history can be DISTORTED right in front of you. If they're doing it today... guess they'd never do anything so deceptive back in the day for economic, financial, political, psychological and etc. gain -- YEAH RIGHT!

[BggProductions]

That book might be great but this six minute advert could be a hell of a lot better.

[wanshei]

Interestingly enough the letter "J" was not in the english language until the year 1049 AD. This itself poses a problem with those who buy into christianity as there is no letter J in the hebrew language. Then i hear that the new testament was written in greek. So...? Is there a Jesus in the Greek language? No. And the New Testament was not written entirely in Greek. Paul was a Roman citizen who did speak other languages but he didnt write the entire new testament.

[ELVISCHALLENGE]

The very opening is bogus. How can Jerusalem be of a Roman empire or Contantinople when the dead sea scrolls pre-date Rome in this region? The Hebrew bible is the most evidenced writing humanity possesses. The Tel Dan find proves King David 3,200 years ago and an Egyptian stelle mentions a war with Israel 3,500 years ago. Which other scripture can equal that?