One of the most dominant myths used by forces opposed to marriage equality is that allowing same-sex couples to marry would somehow negatively affect religious institutions or apply restrictions to...
One of the most dominant myths used by forces opposed to marriage equality is that allowing same-sex couples to marry would somehow negatively affect religious institutions or apply restrictions to their freedom to worship as they choose.
Although this myth is patently false, that has not stopped some opponents from using the claim to lead people to believe their religious freedom is in danger. Fortunately, in New York, we do not need to speculate on how religious institutions, spiritual life and the freedom to worship will be affected if the state passes a law allowing same-sex couples to marry. New York needs only to look to our neighbor to the east, Massachusetts — where marriages for same-sex couples have been legal since 2004 — to see that the worries about such a law negatively impacting people of faith have been unfounded.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I don't understand the argument "Marriage is a religious institution." No it's not. You are only married at City Hall, the church ceremony is purely a tradition, but it's not legal anyway. It's the law! Hello! Hence, marriage is not tight to religious values, but to the law.
You don't like gay people getting married? Fine, but at least bring me an argument that makes sense (btw, there isn't one, but keep trying) :o)
The separation of church and state prevents the government from interfering with religious organisations, so the government cannot force any religious group to marry any couple for any reason. Orthodox Jews do not marry non-Jews. Catholics do not marry divorced people (or even interfaith couples without a permit from the bishop). All is fine, due to the separation.
I wonder why certain religious organisations think that they can try to dictate who can and cannot marry outside their churches.
My guess is that pastors will never be required by law to marry any couple because that would violate the principle of separation of church and state.
Where government gets involved in churches is that it sometimes refuses to provide government subsidies if those monies are going to be used for proselytizing, i.e. evangelizing, i.e. attempting to convert people to the religion or denomination of the particular church.
Colfax, I guess it's because they're private institutions. They're like private clubs, and the government says that you can discriminate within a private club. That's why the Boy Scouts can exclude gay people and atheists. And it's why churches can refuse to ordain women or refuse to marry people of different faiths.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
You don't like gay people getting married? Fine, but at least bring me an argument that makes sense (btw, there isn't one, but keep trying) :o)
not some fictional creature
now if you want a fairy tale look in the bible its the biggest one out there
I wonder why certain religious organisations think that they can try to dictate who can and cannot marry outside their churches.
Where government gets involved in churches is that it sometimes refuses to provide government subsidies if those monies are going to be used for proselytizing, i.e. evangelizing, i.e. attempting to convert people to the religion or denomination of the particular church.