Glenn Beck: 'Obama Has A Deep-Seated Hatred For White People'

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• glenn
• beck
• barack
• obama
• racism
• racist
• gates
• crowley
• police
• fox
• friends

[zeuslives11]

are you happy now you liebtards now that your antichrist glenn beck is gone????

[zeuslives11]

@steven94116 you are one to talk look at bill maher!!!!:(

[lovecrafted]

didnt know whites had a culture :O

[RyderSpearmann]

@seunketchup88 One problem: I am not trying to prove he is, nor do I think Beck was.

Beck said that he thinks Obama is a racist. (which you now have learned does not explicitly mean hate), and he made it clear that it was by making a broad survey of Obama's life.

If there seems a possibility that Obama is racist, then for many voters, that would be something to consider.

One has to weigh it, even proof is not available. It's part of forming an opinion about someone.

[RyderSpearmann]

@seunketchup88 moronic. with a thesaurus, you can link every word to every other word, eventually... it's like six degrees of Kevin Bacon.

And if you had more brains, you would have looked up synonym before you started running your mouth, you would know that words do not need to be equal.. only very similar, and since words can have many different meanings, they can have many more "similar" synonyms and very quickly, you are far from your original word.

It's not math my friend. Define "sick"

[seunketchup88]

@RyderSpearmann You misunderstood my point because you were busy calling me a slob because I demonstrated to you were wrong on the definition of words Beck's lack of logic. I have given you examples of logical fallacies that not only Beck was committing, but you committed Yourself. Throughout this argument you shown an inability to debate with a civil calm rational mind. I am done wasting my time with you. You are intellectually inferior.

[seunketchup88]

@RyderSpearmann I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall. I never said anything about Obama couldn't possibly be racist ANYWHERE. I am saying now with the available evidence we discussed, you and Beck have failed to prove that he is.

[RyderSpearmann]

@seunketchup88 As I said, it is not a part of the definition "except to slobs", which I said right up front.

I know dictionaries have had to add it in recent history, because of people that don't know what the fuck they are talking about, and language degrades because morons won't shut up.

[RyderSpearmann]

@seunketchup88 No, you showed me that is it part of the usage of slobs.

I recognize the proper definition. Since you NOW KNOW that primary definitions that do NOT include hatred, then my point is made. You can't say that hatred is automatically implicit in racism.

Tell me that charges of racism EXPLICITLY IMPLIES HATRED.

I said what I said, to get you to open a dictionary, so that you could learn the actual meaning.

And you are a definition slob that changes the meaning of words by misuse.

[seunketchup88]

@RyderSpearmann Your original premise hatred was in no way included as part of the definition. I just showed you that it was. You said it was not legitimate because it was included because...slobs changed it? Let me demonstrate to your complete lack of logic.You're saying hatred is nor included in racism because only slobs think hatred is part of racism. That is an Ad Hominem logical fallacy. Primary definition is irrelevant. It's included in the definition. I proved you wrong.

[RyderSpearmann]

@seunketchup88 I think I misunderstood your point as Obama being singled out.

You mean Wright was singled out. Yes, and others. If you were a racist, don't you think it would be hard to associate ONLY with racists? Where could you do that?

If you were a politician I don't think it would even be POSSIBLE to associate only with racists. Where could one do that in politics?

If it is impossible to do, then you would have to be a racist that associates with people who aren't. Not a good defense.

[RyderSpearmann]

@seunketchup88 You are mistaking your own defense. You mistakenly said you didn't have to prove a negative.

Classic logic and philosophy teach us that you CAN NOT prove a negative. You blew it. You are pretending that you have the option, when you don't. I was being nice enough to overlook it.

Since you can't prove a negative, you can't prove Obama is not a racist.... so you have to leave open the possibility that he is.

That's all I'm saying.