Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Old colonial sores that modern China must heal 2009 07 06 CCTV 乌鲁木齐市 china today

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,106
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 6, 2009

Xinjiang's bloody Sunday explosion of violence in Urumqi has underscored the struggle of ethnic minorities to find a place in a modernising China and a homogenising world.

As in Lhasa last year, a peaceful protest suddenly became a murderous race riot. Then, it was indigenous Tibetans beating Han and Hui settlers to death, destroying their shops and cars. This time, it appears to be mainly Uighurs.

Then, as now, Beijing blamed exile leaders for orchestrating the unrest. First the Dalai Lama, now Rebiya Kadeer, of the World Uighur Congress.

The counter-accusations are also similar. Uighur exiles accuse the security forces of provoking violence by killing protesters and fostering resentment with tight restrictions on religious, cultural and political autonomy. In both cases the outside world's views have been obscured, partly because of Chinese restrictions on the media and partly because of the sheer distance of the two areas from the industrialised world. Buddhist Tibetans and Muslim Uighurs share a similar predicament.

While most of the world industrialised, their two regions remained islands, falling behind economically and politically, while maintaining a strong cultural and religious identity.

They were never completely remote. Major Francis Younghusband's murderous invasion of Tibet is one of the darkest episodes of British imperialism. Mao Zedong went further in 1949 by ordering the People's Liberation Army into Xinjiang (which means New Frontier) and Tibet. This year the authorities are celebrating the 60th anniversary of what the state media often refers to as the "peaceful liberation". For exile groups, it was simply an invasion.

Until 60 years ago Beijing ruled the country's fringes with a distant hand, largely because access was difficult and the economic benefits questionable. That has changed dramatically with the rise of Chinese power and globalising technology. Roads, railways and airports put Lhasa and Urumqi within easy reach of Beijing. The country needs Tibet's water and Xinjiang's oil and gas.

Beijing has strengthened its grip with a programme of rapid economic development, tight controls on religious belief, a big military presence and an influx of Han and Hui migrants. These ethnic groups are now the majority in the capitals of Tibet and Xinjiang and appear to gain most of the economic benefits. Two of the sparks for the latest unrest were the demolition of the old Uighur capital in Kashgar and the killing of two Uighur migrants by a mob of Han in Shaoguan, on the other side of China.

The fear now is that racial violence is intensifying. The biggest difference between the riots in Tibet and Xinjiang is the death toll. According to government figures 156 died in Urumqi, more than seven times as many as in Lhasa. These figures, like the causes of the riots, are disputed, but clearly a long simmering problem has reached boiling point. "There is no justification for ethnically targeted violence, but this calls into question how effective the central government's policies have been towards minorities," said Nicholas Bequelin of Human Rights Watch. "These riots will have a long-lasting impact on already bad ethnic relations in Xinjiang."

China needs to rethink its approach to the ethnic issue. As with all nations that pioneered "new frontiers", the adjustment is likely to be painful.
Printable version Send to a friend Share Clip Contact us larger | smaller EmailClose Recipient's email address Your first name Your surname Add a note (optional)




Your IP address will be logged
ShareClose Digg reddit Google Bookmarks Twitter del.icio.us StumbleUpon Newsvine livejournal Facebook Mixx it! Contact usClose Report errors or inaccuracies: reader@guardian.co.uk
Letters for publication should be sent to: letters@guardian.co.uk
If you need help using the site: userhelp@guardian.co.uk
Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
+44 (0)20 3353 2000

Advertising guide
License/buy our content
World news
China · Human rights · Protest · Tibet · Religion
More analysis

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HannibalFL86 It's not really autonomous, because the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) still has total control, and they are almost entirely Han Chinese. The Uighurs have practically no representation in "Xinjiang Province" (Chinese occupied East Turkestan), which is why they are rioting. A province is a bit like a US State.

  • Not once the OCCUPATION mentioned in this video clip! It is sickening the amount of the brainwash the chiinese people are been subjected to, thoosevuygurs are a Turkic race who has established many great empires they are ancient people of central Asia whose land has been confiscated by the communist china ! 35 million uygurs has been killed in the past 60 years they are been treated less than animals in their own land!they have lost everything they had what would you expect them to do? Hug and

  • I don't get what an "autonomous" region is.. is this equal to a US State or something different entirely?

  • No matter what, people in all cultures and societies value respect. It's not only a matter of giving people money, not everyone in the world is a "development whore."  Violence is not the best answer, but China does have a history of "using history to serve the present." China has changed over the centuries, it hasn't always been a modern state. It must provide true respect and autonomy for people, otherwise it becomes guilty of doing the same thing the Western imperialists did to itself.

  • I totally Agree.

  • ahahaha viets suckin on american dicks even tho they nepalmed and agent orangd ur ass. how humiliating lmao

  • its a relevant point. That is Beijing's treatment of preripharal unrest. don't be so agressive!

  • China must take all the necessary steps to maintain its territorial integrity. They must work towards the economic prosperity of Xinjiang. Uyghurs are the part of Chinese people. Racial difference can not be the reason to say that we want to break the country because we are having different racial genetics. China must increase its Han presence in Xinjiang and also de-islamize the Uyghurs so peace can return to Xinjiang.

  • china stop invasion, chinese is the world deadly virus

  • i'm aware that this isn't tibet but very aware that the same tactics are used by chinesespecial forces as well as social policies, in tibet, uighuristan and mongolia.

    as in tibet, officials claimed they have "proof" the riots were foreign-agitated, but, as in tibet, they refuse to make public their "proof".

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more