Searching for Evolutionists Who will Defend Their Position (DEBATE DODGERS)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re6d-EvKkbA
Dr. Gary Parker, Dr. Thomas Kindell, and Dr. Jobe Martin as evolutionists found the truth of creation.
Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin, and knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded...Ironically we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time......by this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information. David Raup, Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology, Chicago Field Museum Bulletin, January 1979
Thermodynamic Arguments for Creation by Dr. Kindell - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV3WWDfGsX4 .
How Quickly Could Fossils Have Formed? by Dr. Parker - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEzSTNn1Fgk .
Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm
Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone
KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search
The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
http://www.icr.org
Listened to first 12 seconds, threw my hands up in the air and yelled `DONE!`and resumed watching videos of crocodiles murdering other animals
iguardo 3 months ago
@5tonyvvvv I think that is supposition. There is no reason to believe that an imbalance could not have happened in the past. Even if we treat your statement as true it is irrelevant to the subsequent evolution that followed. Now i don't know if you believe in such stuff as taking Genesis literally but if you do then your own assertion defeats your own belief since homochirality is impossible with dust as the source. In fact what is your explanation for first life? Warning"God Dunnit" is a fail.
pilgrimpater 7 months ago
@BeholdTheExtinction Homochirality proves life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@pilgrimpater Homochirality proves life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@BeholdTheExtinction None of what you said answers the question of what created the creator & you can't address the fact that it must have aquired it's intelligence somehow. How do you know the Laws of the Universe did not exist prior to the birth of this universe? As usual this creation stuff is all supposition based upon wishful thinking. Microbiology does indeed disprove a one off 6 day creation & the fruit fly experiments prove speciation in the lab with real science What have Creos got? 0
pilgrimpater 7 months ago
@BeholdTheExtinction Also you are putting faith in an unproven theory. Many so called "fossil records" have been proven to be hoaxes or erroneous (i.e pilt down man, nebraska man, Neanderthal) or to even be fabricated. You have faith that lies or inaccurate information are not printed for nefarious purposes. I doubt you've been conducting experiments, or digging in the dirt. All of your info, comes from secondhand sources that report things you haven't seen with your eyes but believe anyway.
BeholdTheExtinction 7 months ago
@pilgrimpater The laws of thermodynamics are only applicable to this universe, so to attach it to a being that supposedly exists (and created the law in the first place) outside our continuum is ridiculous. To use the term microbiology with regards to a supernatural being is even more laughable. Also, to what labs are you referring? If anything the labs have proved the opposite (fruit fly experiment).
BeholdTheExtinction 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone h t t p://w w wDOTnewscientistDOTcom/article/dn17060-first-dino-blood-extracted-from-ancient-boneDOThtml A hadrosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells that may help shed light on dinosaur evolution. Not a creation site.
BereanBeacon1 8 months ago
No scientist in the world can make life or even the building blocks of life. All they have is assumptions! that one molecule might have linked up with another, or life flew in from space, or polarized light made complex molecules, its all assumptions! Homochirality proves natural processes can not produce life!!
5tonyvvvv 8 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Please get your comprehension skills up to scratch. "I don't know" applies to first life and not to the subsequent evolution. Surely that is not too hard for you to grasp. "I don't know" is the opopsite of faith which is "i guess (because it suits my peconceptions". No faith whatsoever needed for Evolution by the way.
pilgrimpater 9 months ago