From the Blindness of Evolution to the Light of Creation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,640
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 5, 2007

Searching for Evolutionists Who will Defend Their Position (DEBATE DODGERS)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re6d-EvKkbA

Dr. Gary Parker, Dr. Thomas Kindell, and Dr. Jobe Martin as evolutionists found the truth of creation.

Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin, and knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded...Ironically we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time......by this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information. David Raup, Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology, Chicago Field Museum Bulletin, January 1979

Thermodynamic Arguments for Creation by Dr. Kindell - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV3WWDfGsX4 .

How Quickly Could Fossils Have Formed? by Dr. Parker - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEzSTNn1Fgk .

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
http://www.icr.org

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (179)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Listened to first 12 seconds, threw my hands up in the air and yelled `DONE!`and resumed watching videos of crocodiles murdering other animals

  • @5tonyvvvv I think that is supposition. There is no reason to believe that an imbalance could not have happened in the past. Even if we treat your statement as true it is irrelevant to the subsequent evolution that followed. Now i don't know if you believe in such stuff as taking Genesis literally but if you do then your own assertion defeats your own belief since homochirality is impossible with dust as the source. In fact what is your explanation for first life? Warning"God Dunnit" is a fail.

  • @BeholdTheExtinction Homochirality proves life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!

  • @pilgrimpater Homochirality proves life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!

  • @BeholdTheExtinction None of what you said answers the question of what created the creator & you can't address the fact that it must have aquired it's intelligence somehow. How do you know the Laws of the Universe did not exist prior to the birth of this universe? As usual this creation stuff is all supposition based upon wishful thinking. Microbiology does indeed disprove a one off 6 day creation & the fruit fly experiments prove speciation in the lab with real science What have Creos got? 0

  • @BeholdTheExtinction Also you are putting faith in an unproven theory. Many so called "fossil records" have been proven to be hoaxes or erroneous (i.e pilt down man, nebraska man, Neanderthal) or to even be fabricated. You have faith that lies or inaccurate information are not printed for nefarious purposes. I doubt you've been conducting experiments, or digging in the dirt. All of your info, comes from secondhand sources that report things you haven't seen with your eyes but believe anyway.

  • @pilgrimpater The laws of thermodynamics are only applicable to this universe, so to attach it to a being that supposedly exists (and created the law in the first place) outside our continuum is ridiculous. To use the term microbiology with regards to a supernatural being is even more laughable. Also, to what labs are you referring? If anything the labs have proved the opposite (fruit fly experiment).

  • @5tonyvvvv First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone h t t p://w w wDOTnewscientistDOTcom/article­/dn17060-first-dino-blood-extr­acted-from-ancient-boneDOThtml A hadrosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells that may help shed light on dinosaur evolution. Not a creation site.

  • No scientist in the world can make life or even the building blocks of life. All they have is assumptions! that one molecule might have linked up with another, or life flew in from space, or polarized light made complex molecules, its all assumptions! Homochirality proves natural processes can not produce life!!

  • @5tonyvvvv Please get your comprehension skills up to scratch. "I don't know" applies to first life and not to the subsequent evolution. Surely that is not too hard for you to grasp. "I don't know" is the opopsite of faith which is "i guess (because it suits my peconceptions". No faith whatsoever needed for Evolution by the way.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more