Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Evolution Ep1: Darwin's Dangerous Idea (3/11)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
63,495
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 26, 2007

Interweaving key moments of drama in Darwin's life with current research, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea" explores why his theory of evolution might matter even more today than it did in his own time.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "Even the transitional forms which u mention as well as the others can be counted on the hand."

    No Strikefighter you can`t.

    There are thousands of them.

    And no, There is no debate over these.

    Only in the minds of the laymen does this controversy exist.

  • So Far you have Presented nothing that Contains any Scientific Merit Or value what so ever.

    You have misused the Term Theory, you do not know what Transitional form means, You use the Useless argument of Haeckels embryos and Nebraska man "which was not a Hoax by the way, It was a mistake" are useless to your postion?

    You can`t present to me anything which i have not seen other under educated spoon fed Laymen try to use.

see all

All Comments (175)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Cnidarious and you have failed basic capitalization

  • Considering Evolution shows we are all related, how can the biologists justify killing them?

  • @Sustenance21 It is Liam Neeson.

  • @franzsmr Ah, thank you very much for taking the time to. I should have just taken the time to do it myself, but I thought I was mistaken for sure. Anyway, again, thank you. ^^

  • @Sustenance21 I just looked it up. It is Liam Neeson :)

  • The narrator sounds an awful lot like Liam Neeson.

  • Anyone who wants to make the assertion, "Science doesn't disprove God." is like saying, "Science doesn't disprove unicorns." Both statements are correct but this does not imply that such beings do exist since that is an appeal to ignorance logical fallacy. The burden of proof lies with the religious folk that God does exist, not for scientists to prove he doesn't since one cannot disprove a negative.

  • @eddiedenied just for you i will make sure all spelling and grammar are correct from now on!

    don't try to discredit what i have said because of a typo try and be an adult about it.

  • @faron27 sense* lol that typo just told me all arguments you have are piss poor based on your lack of education. And darkness does exist without light just an fyi.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more