Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Panic Demo by Future Crew

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,131
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 4, 2008

http://www.theblondejoke.com




Panic Demo by Future Crew

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SuperClr)

  • Probably a 486 or first generation pentium. It's nigh impossible to get these running outside DOS.

    Or maybe a new computer running it in DOSBox.

  • Yeah its Dosbox not sure why it plays up, and dont know how to work around it without installing dos =/

  • Out of interest, what system was this running on? It seems to be chugging at the 'fractal jelly' part, and it's definitely not happy at the end...

  • Yeah its Dosbox not sure why it plays up, and dont know how to work around it without installing dos =/

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @jaymzjulian ctrl+f12 in dosbox

  • @tapewolf this is running on DOSBOX. i recognise the errors

  • i think the fractals are precalculated in the demo. i cant see that this can be so fast if it ineed to render all the fractal again and again.

  • The demo ran fine on my 386sx33, although the fractals were jerky

  • I had a 386sx 33mhz and recall getting the same speed on the fractals Surely on a modern PC even with a dos box it should zip through those fractals..

  • hmm, are you super sure that it wasn't a 486DX ?...

    at the same clock speed of 25 MHz, you could get a 386SX, 386DX, 486SX or 486DX, which would all run at different speeds from each other, except that many programs ran at the same speed on 486DX as on the 486SX; however, when they didn't, then the 486DX was usually EXTREMELY better.

    afaik, a 486SX-25 was usually about the same speed as a 386DX-50, which wasn't *so* much different from a 386DX-40.

  • 486 back then ran the fractal part smoothly (386 conversely had a hard time with that). Also a real pc wouldn't trash the scrollers suck section.

    My 386DX40 barely ran this demo, but my Dell 486SX (25 mhz?) had no problems with it.

  • i recall that i got this kind of speed with a 386 or perhaps even a 486sx. This part was really designed for the strongest "consumer" desktops of the time, the 486dx's, especially the dx2 and dx3.

  • The reason for dosbox playing up on the fractal part, is that the auto-cycle detector incorrectly detects panic as requiring the cpu of a 286 - the demo mostly works, though, because of dosbox's fast, fast video access vs. a real pc. The solution is to force dosbox to use the max cpu cycles (or increase them to 10000+), then the fractal stuff works fine. The VGA register hacking stuff ("scrollers suck" and the realplasma) still suffer fail on dosbox, tho

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more