The Past is an Illusion

To read along, go to http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2008/10/past-is-illusion.html
Other links from this entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/460260

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• bryanton
• dimension
• experiencing
• illusion
• imagining
• memes
• past
• philosophy
• physics
• rob
• tenth

[bambamboom2]

Because the 4 dimension branches in the 5th i believe may prove that there is actual measurable time frames to branch off of, because if these time frames or "moments" were infinitely granular then you cant create a branch off it. and for there to be objects arranged in physical space at different points in time shows that the past carries over into the present in order to deliver its old information on how the universe is currently arranged. ah end of thought youtube has a char limit \:

[10thdim]

@bambamboom2 I agree! And as it turns out a number of theories about the nature of the universe, including holographic universe and loop quantum gravity theories, are also based upon the granular, non-continuous nature of space-time.

In my video The Holographic Universe I talk about Germany's GEO600, which some scientists say has proven the non-continuous one-planck-frame-after-another nature of our reality through direct observation.

watch?v=hMLVjFrtq6Q

Thanks for writing!

Rob

[innerlocus]

Can anyone give me the link to: xerocs or zeadrocks site he talks about?

[10thdim]

@innerlocus Do you see underneath the video where it says "To read along go to..."? Follow that link and you'll see the link to the game within the text at the point where I talk about the game. Sorry, YouTube doesn't let us paste links within comments so I can't just give you the link here.

Thanks for writing!

Rob

[gustawolf07]

could it be that time is like a chocolate bar wrapper which unwraps and lets us see what's inside but hey the chocolate is not being made when we unwrapp it. So yeah time could be an illussion because it makes us think that things get build by time in time but in reallity everything is already there, we just see it little by little as it unwraps

[10thdim]

@gustawolf07 That's the best description of understanding timelessness I've read all day. Thanks!

Rob

[WorldsJungleGym]

Pussy pussy pussy tits tits tits ahhhhhh

[SomeR8comment]

Time is not an illision it actually happens and why does everyone agree with this shit.

[flamingbalsac1]

don't either? you would exist in a world where everything exists as one thing in all times at one time. no separation and effectively no existence, individuality, or thought. i feel like both concepts can be used to postulate the physical manifestation of conscious death and conscious birth. the later being the idea that being born into individual conscious reality would be to be separated from the all encompasing, non-existant all-existence. i'd love to hear your thoughts if you have the time.

[flamingbalsac1]

on a different note. I've often wondered about the implications of thinking of consciousness philosophy in relation to multi dimensional explanations of time, space and displacement, and reality. if you view these concepts from the philosophical idea that only your conscious existence can be confirmed (at least more than anything else can be), then couldn't you imagine dying and your consciousness existing in a realm where time does not exist and therefore space or distance or displacement

[flamingbalsac1]

wow.... bin watching alot of your videos and i'm fairly into them but when that song started..... you sir are a golden god!

[rockinfetus916]

@jtwiztidbagz hey! I thought of that too, because sometimes I feel like I can remember my past but I think the current me is not the same as before, and the memories and learned consciousness is transferred to my current self, its actually pretty crazy and complicated..but we may be right.

[PopeOnArope123]

is anyone else hearing "pussy pussy pussy tits tits tits tits ahhhhhhhhh" in the intro song thingy?

[Florian00007]

why u have 1000 ears ? i was joking :P



[1y9b9b]

So a flatlander will never be able to see anything as a whole (3D), no matter how small, and can only view parts of something as it passes?

Which means whatever he is observing MUST only be part of the whole.

Does that mean he has infinitely telescopic, and microscopic vision? As he can only see through a slit that is (infinitely?) thin? So for example, he sees parts of atoms (small) and parts of whole stars (large) when observing?

[1y9b9b]

you're making WAVES (those special graphics you used) out of PARTICLES (yourself)

!!!

Interesting!