TAPS, Ghost Hunters Manson Murders K2 DeBunk-FAKE!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
61,264
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 8, 2009

Watch this too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do4bNbn-Tk8
Jay holds the K2. The K2's first replies are YES! As in YES it's FAKE.
This was extremely difficult to catch but it IS the same shot of Jay's hand when the K2 replies YES.
You see the K2 register YES as the camera then pans upward towards Jay as he looks over at Grant.
Fleming asks a 2nd question & the answer again is YES. It IS the same shot as the 1st! except they ONLY show J's hand. They do not show the camera panning upwards towards him. They couldn't because you'd say, I JUST SAW THAT!
They instead edit the first YES, showcasing only just J's hand to make it appear to be a 2nd YES & cutting away before the camera pans upward as it did originally.
If this were real, they wouldn't have to FAKE IT by editing the 1st response to make it appear TO BE A LEGITIMATE 2nd response.
The K2 is very easily manipulated. It is a magic disco wand,that has as much credibility as Grant. NONE. If it worked as Chris Fleming says it does it would be a must at every funeral home.
Lastly for the believers who then say, the camera man probably didn't record the 2nd yes so they just replayed the same shot to prove it. So, you mean they FAKED it? DUH!

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 50 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ultimatetubetime)

  • To be fair this doesn't prove anything. As editing films myself, I would have done the same thing if the first shot I had was better than the second one.. Think about it!, it it was fake, than they could have simply rugged the machine and filmed it blinking twice a hundred times! They wouldn't need to edit it to make it fake..

  • @Staz222 it's also SLOPPY editing. THINK ABOUT IT! Star Wars has dozens of editing snafu's, goofs, mistakes. One of the biggest movies of all time is loaded with more mistakes than a low budget film. Sloppy editing. Continuity. Goofs. To be fair this video proves everything. The took the cheap way out & just showed the same shot & if you edited as much as you say, you could see it's the SAME shot.

  • What probably happened is that when he got the first response, it was caught on camera and very obvious to the audience. But when the second response was given, the cameraman could have been out of position or it wasn't as distinct a response so naturally they had to edit the footage. There's going to be a production aspect of any thing that needs to be edited (GA included) it is the responsibility of the viewer to determine whether or not he/she believes the footage's intent to be deceptive.

  • @TheJthompson2380 You just debunked it as FAKING it. Something they claim they would NEVER allow. It is the same clip twice & the disco wand aka K2 is a Chris Fleming Fraud O Rama Fun Toy.

see all

All Comments (301)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mattsociety at least they are fun to watch lol

  • @ultimatetubetime Oh I agree. All those shows are mostly fake in my opinion.

  • Ive never seen actual proof even at their live shows. They do way too much video editing. damn its christmas time santa must be a ghost. Look at that dog its a ghost. Dinasours walk with us today. Come on get real with this. Bible says once ur dead ur soul goes to heaven not walk around earth. For what walks the earth is evil not actual ghosts of people who died.

  • Thats how taps gets u. They make u think their debunking stuff 1st yet their just trying to roll one over on u. Its syfi. Come get real no actual proof shows that they can prove a haunting

  • @ultimatetubetime and just out of curiosity, have you ever watched the show? These guys are very apt at attempting to debunk a claim before they prove it. They rarely call a location haunted unless the evidence is there. And the fact is that you can post as many videos as you want to try and discount certain pieces of evidence but unless you have solid proof that every bit of evidence they acquire is fake, than you come out with less credibility than they do. That's why this show is so alluring.

  • @ultimatetubetime they aren't faking evidence, if they were then they would have been able to make this "disco wand" light up on command more than once. I have never once said that these guys have never or will never fake evidence. Simply because I am not a member of the TAPS crew. But if you come at this sort of thing with the mindset that they do, then it becomes easy to discount the production value of it by making every simple edit or retake another example of faking evidence.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more