1931 Frankenstein - Girl and the pond
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (214)
-
Such a sweet yet depressing scene. But then funny for all the wrong reasons.
-
@MrFalconford This movie has almost nothing to do with the work of Mary Shelley. It's based on the stage play by Peggy Webling, the storyline is completely different from the novel as well as most characters. Her depiction of the Creature and its intentions (she never calls it "Monster") is so much more complex and therefor upsetting than this movie conveys. Unfortunately most people consider this to be the "real Frankenstein"...
-
I see the art of why this scene was in the film, but i clearly see the reason why it was cut from the movie for decades. Don't forget, Frankinstein didn't really know much of the difference between wrong or right.
-
Frankenstein is a classic, I love this movie
-
mary shelley was no fool, ask yourself why someone would throw a child away? and the person who threw the child away was considered a monster? humm dont think to hard you might just hurt yourself
-
haha we watched this movie in school and when he threw her in the pool our whole class was cracking up
this some funny shitt
-
@MultiComandercody In the book, he turns against humanity for forsaking him, and starts killing those who are close to Victor, even framing Victor's father's maid for the murder of Victor Frankenstein's brother. Victor knows she is innocent, but he cannot admit it, as doing so would admit he has created this monster. The monster kills his beloved also, as the monster wanted a mate, a female, but Victor would not create such a creature. The monster retaliates against him.
-
It is not his fauld!
-
so frankenstiens monster has the brain of a killer
-
When I first saw this I was like Aww this is so cute! wait...no no, don't throw her in the water....ok she's in the water.....wait she's drowning?! NOOO!
poor girl... T___T
MegaKossak 6 months ago 10
OMG This is some funny ass shit
WaltonWillie 3 months ago 7