Evolution nwo debate world order science

Evolution and the NWO Evidence and lack of

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Kent
• Hovind
• Creationism
• Evolution
• Ali
• Dinosaurs
• Dr.
• Dino
• Vitamin
• B17
• Amygdalin
• Creation
• Preacher
• Science
• Technology
• Evol

[dhsgf]

no free speech for you

[BalmungSama0]

"In any case, the gap theory clearly contradicts the bible by putting death before sin."

The Bible says that there are two types of death. Spiritual death and physical death. Taken in context, Genesis is refering to spiritual death.

"Clear and simple heresy nothing to it - even though some notable and devoted (no doubt about it) men of God believe/d it. "

There are other ways to interpret things besides your own. Shrinking your world doesn't make the rest of it go away.

[BalmungSama0]

"Then Ken Miller is obviously an evolutionist/gap theorist."

He is an evolutionist, but he's not a gap theorist. It's more of a contextual interpretation.

"The fact that he is a "church going judge appointed by a christian governor" doesn't make him a biblical creationist."

He isn't a creationist. He's actually intelligent.

[RufroX9]

Then Ken Miller is obviously an evolutionist/gap theorist. The fact that he is a "church going judge appointed by a christian governor" doesn't make him a biblical creationist. Just like going to a garage doesn't make you a car, going to church doesn't make you a christian. In any case, the gap theory clearly contradicts the bible by putting death before sin. Clear and simple heresy nothing to it - even though some notable and devoted (no doubt about it) men of God believe/d it.

[BalmungSama0]

Ah. Sorry about that. But you should watch the videos. They present extremely conclusive bits of evidence of evolution.

[RufroX9]

I wasn't talking about the ERV or the Chromosome ones. I'll probably watch those as well, but I was looking for a video under this heading

"Evolution nwo debate world order science". And this is what pops out... lol.

[BalmungSama0]

"If that is a reference to the age of anything, then that trees found this way took at least 300 million years to die and fossilize that way. No, the geological column is not accurate, nor should it be used for anything. "

Since those trees are burried in layers completely seperate from the column and are found near dried-up rivers, it shows that they were burried rapidly by numerous local floods. The geologic column is irrelevant because the layers are seperate from the column.

[BalmungSama0]

"The same places where trees are found petrified happily piercing through all of the geological eras, while being carbonated at the bottom and at the top at the same time?"

Those trees are found in layers seperate from the egologic column. They only exist in areas near the trees. Those trees were burried rapidly by local floods, which explains why these trees are always found near dried up rivers, and other bodies of water.

[RufroX9]

The same places where trees are found petrified happily piercing through all of the geological eras, while being carbonated at the bottom and at the top at the same time? If that is a reference to the age of anything, then that trees found this way took at least 300 million years to die and fossilize that way. No, the geological column is not accurate, nor should it be used for anything.

[BalmungSama0]

Are you to lazy to go to a user named BonoboBill and find the videos? Fine. I'll link them here.

ERVs:

/watch?v=De-OkzTUDVA

Chromosome #2:

/watch?v=x-WAHpC0Ah0