Prof. Molimard on prohibition and passive smoking
Top Comments
All Comments (10)
-
ROFL's writing style is suspiciously similar to Cathy Bell's. Is it possible that the cowardly and hypocritical Mr. Jones is rearing his ugly head again?
-
Which part of Iro Cyr ''read Pr. Molimard's message'' did ROFL 1A not understand? Was the message so threatening to this anti-smoker's comfort zone that the only thing he could do is attack the messanger ?
Others have tried to libel me and CAGE anonymously Mr. ROFL and they will be meeting us in court in a not so distant future. Care to join them or retract your lies?
Iro Cyr
C.A.G.E.
-
Citizen ROFL 1A,
Is that citizen of the NSDAP ?
You are an idiot if you believe your post that 'second hand smoke' causes death and sickness.
Study a few truthful reports and then come back.
Better still catch a copy of a death cert. from anywhere in the world that states 'death from passive smoke'
Get back to therapy and get a life.
-
Citizen ROFL 1A,
Is that citizen of the NSDAP ?
You are an idiot if you believe your post that 'second hand smoke' causes death and sickness.
Study a few truthful reports and then come back.
Better still catch a copy of a death cert. from anywhere in the world that states 'death from passive smoke'
Get back to therapy and get a life.
-
Smoking bans are a threat to the freedom of all(including nonsmokers) and to property rights. They smack of the nanny state and protect nobody. Most of all they are based on lies and she is one of those people who know about it- and I am too. I was at the Conference.
-
ROFL1A poor you- the dummy of the pharmaceutical industry. She has nothing to do with the Tobacco companies. Im afraid there is plenty of controversy and the debate is far from over in fact it hasn barely even begun.
In one respect you are correct ROFL, secondhand smoke has been studied to death (your crappy pun, not mine), but that is where your knowledge of the facts clearly end. Having squandered millions on research into finding evidence to support the claims that SHS harms people, all the anti smoking zealots have achieved is to prove how unfounded their rediculous lies are.
Risk cannot be proven because risk does not exist.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago 9
ROFL wrote, "smoking bans have nothing to do with prohibition and everything to do with protecting (nonsmokers). "
ROFL, if that were true, then why would so many bans stipulate that enclosed smoking rooms or businesses worked in and patronized only by smokers are prohibited? Why would they ban smoking outdoors in parks? Why would they prohibit air cleaning systems that would make the air *CLEANER* than the outdoor air?
Michael J. McFadden,
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
Cantiloper 3 years ago 8