Did Cornelius Van Til and Greg Bahnsen understand basic logic? Does the followers of these two Neo-orthodox theologians understand basic logic? Apparently not, for they still maintain that they can prove God exists from the impossibility of the contrary.
In this video, despite the paradoxical madness permeating the minds of Van Tilians, I make an attempt to explain to these Van Tilians that contraries can both be false. So, for example, by claiming Christianity and Hinduism are contraries, the possibility remains that both may actually be false! What happened to presupposing the Bible to be true? By logical definition, you cannot presuppose the Bible to be true, if you are simultaneously asserting that it may be false. The correct position is that Christianity is true, not from the impossibility of the contrary, but from the impossibility of the contradictory! Got Logic?
Here are two other videos exposing the heresy of Cornelius Van Til:
1) http://youtube.com/watch?v=dYbl_chDY5c
2) http://youtube.com/watch?v=Nv27YnxD-sM
See my channel page for more videos on Calvinism.
All Comments