Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The President Explains His Larger Vision on the Economy

The President explains his larger vision for the economy. The past three months have seem a storm of activity from the White House, with initiatives on housing, the markets, the auto industry, sma...  
 
Customize

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
194 ratings
Sign in to rate
21,256 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (227)   Options

Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
realityalarmclock (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I have given examples but you didn't care to read them before you answer back for argument's sake.
You can read them now. I never took them down.
You're naive and follow out of blind faith.
Peter Shiff wrote a book about this.
You should read it and learn how wrong you are for yourself.
Bottom line, you supported the bailouts.
As time passes and the results are rendered, you will look even more foolish.
Own your failure.
bms4lifem3 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Naive is an appropriate word for your simplistic explanation of the banking situation. A watered down version of Darwinism that completely misses the point as to why the banks failed in the first place. T H E Y W E R E T O O B I G T O F A I L. What banks could take on the huge debt of Lehman brothers, AIG, ect? If those banks aren't bought and are hemorraging funds what happens? There's a reason why Peter Schiff, Ron's Paul's economic advisor didn't come close to getting the RNC nomination.
bms4lifem3 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You're living in a fantasy where your theories are never put to the test. You can bash the government and never take responsibility for the private sectors abysmal performance in the market place. Free Market principals...(Never having to say I SCREWED UP.)
realityalarmclock (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's not Darwinism, it's free market principles.
"What banks could take on the huge debt of Lehman brothers, AIG, ect?"
The world bank. It's a USA bank.

Peter Schiff and Ron Paul predicted this the current crisis for over 6 years.
They were laughed at, then they were proven right.
Say what you want, the people that caused the problem are now Obama's team to fix it.

The federal government should have taken some ownership rather than GIVING the money away.
bms4lifem3 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The world bank? Are you serious. Its a bank that offers loans to third world countries.

Step away from the computer. You are sounding more foolish with each comment.
realityalarmclock (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ron Paul had the majority of the public support.
That's a fact.
He didn't win the nomination because only registered members of the RNC can vote on it.
It costs $35,000 to register as a Republican party member.
That's why the people that would vote Republican couldn't vote for Ron Paul.
He still holds the record for largest single day online donamtions.
bms4lifem3 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Ron Paul had the majority of the public support."

BASED on what Poll? RNC exit polls? A dream you had?

"It costs $35,000 to register as a Republican party member."

Paper or Plastic? .....Haldol or Lithium?
blockthis08 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Educating?
The fact you can't even debate the content of the speeches, means you might as well treat your commentary like a cartoon, superficial and baseless. Argue the points of what is being said. There are important issues being discussed, Healthcare reform, economy, Afghanistan, ect. Its to be expected. GOP are horrible role models they also act immature, using labels Noobama, liberals, and making simpleton observation that don't contribute to the debate.
blockthis08 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Your chances of going to war tend to increase with GOP president. I'm not sure if the US can fund another frivolous invasion.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.