NOSED OUT

Dictionary definition :
" TO NOSE OUT" : To recognize or detect by or as if by smelling.


The complete video analysis of the WNYW FOX5 "Nose-Out" shot aired live on 9/11. NO matter how this awful error occured, we may all agree that the cockpit of an airplane crashing into a steel building will not emerge from its other side - INTACT.

For definitive proof that the FOX archives have replaced their 9/11 archives due to this horridly botched computer imagery intended to deceive, please watch:
FOXED OUT part2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9LURV-joLI
At the end of "FoxedOut part 2" you will see that the "Nose-Out" shot is actually (even though only for a few frames) STILL VISIBLE IN THE CURRENT FOX5 ARCHIVES !!!


The 9/11 TV HOAX is now comprehensively exposed.
FOR ALL THE Q & A regarding my longstanding research, please visit the SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• nosed
• out
• tv
• fakery
• hoax
• WTC
• new
• york
• 2001
• foxed
• september
• clues
• simon
• shack
• fox
• bush
• cheney
• obama
• busted
• computer
• animation

[alexrivera03]

Your brain sees a nose cone go in and expects a nose cone to come out; that's how it fools you into seeing what you want to believe. But if you look at frame 36 and 37 you can clearly see that it is debris being projected outward. It's only in frame 38 that the projection of debris actually resembles the front of a plane. This video would make more sense if, in the years since 9/11/01, we haven't had ninety-nine-thousand more angles from personal camcorders showing the second impact.

[simonshack]

@alexrivera03 Since you implicitly ask people to use their brains (and eyes) properly, you should be able to see that the initial frames of the nose out are covered by what I call 'blast pixels'( at 2:44 ). Those 'blast pixels' are clearly but the first stage of the 'fireball' which eventually fully engulfs the nosecone.

As for the "99.000- more angles" (actually less than 50), please know that all 'amateur videos' have been thoroughly analyzed, compared and exposed as digital frauds.

[jasonC9595]

it looks like the pixel cloud after the nose comes out is just debris...

[simonshack]

@jasonC9595

It looks like you need to take another look.

[wsee]

@icesurf7 NOT a theory...

the 'planes' were PROVEN 100% fake 5 years ago...see,

911 amateur pt 2 and september clues..

NOW the inevitable FAKE VICTIMS are being exposed...

911 memorial scam clones

911 honor the vicsims

911 actors

911 propaganda...

very compelling stuff!!!

[omgwtfbbqalekx]

@alexrivera03 "Your brain sees a nose cone go in and expects a nose cone to come out"

Are kidding me? I'm not sure what kind of brain you have but my brain says aluminium plane + thick steel beams and concrete = plain disintegrates. I do NOT expect the nose to go out. Speak for yourself.

[OldMrMegaDrive]

Great video, even to somebody who knows nothing about digital imagery. Congrats!

It's sickening to think that leading sociopaths lie to the people, after having probably murdered them. I have heard that the 9/11 attacks were a sacrifice to placate the gods, who would have attended to absorb the fear and horror amidst the carnage.

At 02:37, the nose-out shot seems to indicate a vertical line in mid-air that flattens the nose. Pointed at 02:36, as demonstrated for frames 5 and 38!

[TODB0AMER]

@mlomenzo yes GeorgeWBush saw flight11 impact the north tower before his appointment with 'my pet goat' and has NEVER retracted this claim. People who believe this is "debris" exiting have to come up with an exit hole 20ft in diameter on the "F175" exit side of WTC2. Dust in the form of a 3 dimensional moving object? YET another 9/11 first and last!

[mlomenzo]

But what about this nagging point. What about the people that actually saw it? And I am not smashing you here. I am just from NY, and know plenty of friends that saw it as it happened. Some of them from quite close.

[chrisherself]

The day I watched the clips on TV, I had a nagging thought that it all looked 'fake' somehow. I chalked it up to being conditioned to seeing special effects on TV my whole life; something like this in real life wasn't going to look "Hollywood-perfect." Friends watching with me noticed the same, not-quite-right quality about the footage also. Now I'm a full-time video compositor and I can't help but question this footage with more critical eyes. This is some pretty damning evidence, right here.

[PsychotronicWar]

Excellent video Simon. The only explanation: a glitch in the Matrix. Who ever got it, got it...