I just sat and listened to her argument. It ended up being fallacious and hopelessly misguided. If you feel my assessment is not justified by enough evidence, then take fault with the presenter of the argument, but I feel she adequately explained the modern liberal / social democratic position. If you're not familiar with Murray Rothbard's writings, I'd suggest you acquaint yourself with him for a *much* deeper understanding of political philosophy instead of this toddler stuff.
This is the kind of stale drivel that passes for cutting-edge sophistication in the universities? Her monologue was filled with rehashed fallacies that were exploded hundreds of years ago.
@scagbot33
I just sat and listened to her argument. It ended up being fallacious and hopelessly misguided. If you feel my assessment is not justified by enough evidence, then take fault with the presenter of the argument, but I feel she adequately explained the modern liberal / social democratic position. If you're not familiar with Murray Rothbard's writings, I'd suggest you acquaint yourself with him for a *much* deeper understanding of political philosophy instead of this toddler stuff.
selfrealizedexile 3 months ago
@selfrealizedexile If you bothered to learn anything about Nussbaum, you'd realize how foolish it is to write what you wrote.
scagbot33 3 months ago
nanny states are, in fact, pure political evil
sonnetxi 4 months ago
Murray Rothbard > this broad.
This is the kind of stale drivel that passes for cutting-edge sophistication in the universities? Her monologue was filled with rehashed fallacies that were exploded hundreds of years ago.
selfrealizedexile 7 months ago