Public Transportation: Who Needs It? (Part 1)
Top Comments
All Comments (23)
-
Oh no, Paul Lynde's joined The Tea Party!! The world's gone maaaad!!
-
If all government subsidies and meddling were eliminated, the obvious choice for moving cargo and passengers would be electric traction rail. Since we won't see the end of government meddling until government collapses, we won't see common sense, either.
-
the pie chart looks like pac man
-
-
@Audiomuse Move to Europe
-
Hello, try my flash game about CAR INDUSTRY. Adress is: (some youtube's filter is here, so it is with space's ): w w w . e v i l - e r r o r . n e t / s o c k a
-
@totoroben Paul Lynde as "professional skeptic." Maybe that's why he said "I disagree" a lot in his "Hollywood Squares" days.
-
Public transportation today is need in more places then not. Unfourtunatly, my city (Seattle) and it's King County government invested money to build for us about 35 new cleaner efficent buses that were built in South Carolina. The resounding effect is they are almost bankrupt from the investment and now charging higher fares. We probably will never get those buses until the transportation department starts operating in the black again.Cut routes and fewer services is what the we're getting now
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE FOCUSING MORE ON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION THAN GETTING CHEAPER FUEL?
WE NEED TO STOP BEING SO SPOILED AND INDIVIDUALISTIC HERE IN THE U.S.
Get out and ride with other people. Write to your senators to work to invest more in PT
Audiomuse 3 years ago 10
they look like teabaggers
KentAllard 1 year ago 4