WTC Cross melted together

This video clip suggest that the WTC cross was melted together into this cross shape. I wonder if the salvation army has full-time structural engineers who can explain to us how building fires can melt steel.

It strikes me as odd, because in fact I know engineers who can't figure that one out.

"...this cross is fully extended, melted together with the intense heat. The two beams were never initially a part of the same structure. Heat literally melted them together and the piece of metal that had draped over was 'molten metal', that had literally fallen over one of the arms."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9-11
• wtc
• cross

[g3xter2]

@ilovety65 Sorry, I'm not all that much into outdated fairy tales made up by ancient people in the bronze age because they didn't have any scientific tools to explain their surroundings. The only reason people still believe this nonsense is because they're being told so during a critical phase of neural development at the fear of eternal torture in hell if they don't.

You're a "non believer" in tens of thousands of different gods that exist and existed through time, why not go the extra step?

[OneClownShoe]

How about not letting shit happen like 9/11? How about not letting people in Africa starve to death? How about the Vatican giving up some of that precious money of theirs to feed those Africans, house the homeless and cure every disease on the planet several times over? How about those miracles, god?

[redcapedjoker]

@TimReed22222 Tim we don't know if they tried publishing their papers else where. But again the proof is in the Steel. Did steel melt on 911? The answer is YES. Did a skyscraper fall from a fire for the first time in history? Again the answer is YES. Now "truther", "not truther" these are all labels designed to divide us. I stand for the truth no matter how ugly it is. Will stand with me?

[TimReed22222]

@redcapedjoker "The reason they had to pay to get it published is because everyone else was afraid to publish it."

Did they even try?? Did they submit their paper to ANY relevant experts for review? No, of course not. It's just one more truther excuse. You have yet to demonstrate that they showed their paper to one single thermite expert, let alone gotten their blessing!

Making excuses for why you don't have the proof is not proof!

[redcapedjoker]

@TimReed22222 The reason they had to pay to get it published is because everyone else was afraid to publish it. If you publish it you are going against the federal government. What is a joke is the NIST report about their pancake theory of collapse which is completely unscientific. Sure they got their papers published but so did the people in medieval times who believed the world to be flat. I base my opinion on empirical evidence. In this case they support the conspiracy 100%.

[TimReed22222]

@redcapedjoker "Peer review journal of thermite found at the world trade center dust"

Um, joker, the Bentham "Open" Journal is NOT peer review - it's pay-to-play! That's right, Jones et. al. PAID to get their paper published - unheard-of among REAL scientists!

And even so, they had to SNEAK their paper into the journal behind the chief editor's back - who then RESIGNED IN PROTEST when she found out! True!

The Bentham journal is a total joke among scientists - just ask one.

[TimReed22222]

@redcapedjoker "the report clearly says that beams melted together which were previously not connected."

This isn't an investigative report, it's one guy running his mouth. And what are his qualifications? Is he an engineer? Metallurgist? Firefighter? No - a PASTOR. An officer in the Salvation Army! That may be considered scientific expertise in the truth movement, but the rest of us have higher standards!

ANYONE who looks closely at that cross can see clearly it was NOT melted.

[redcapedjoker]

Peer review journal of thermite found at the world trade center dust ht tp:// w w w.benthamscience.c o m/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TO­CPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00­000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

[redcapedjoker]

@redcapedjoker here is a peer review journal of the thermite found in the world trade center, read it and you might learn something ht tp://ww w.benthamscience.c o m/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TO­CPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00­000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

[redcapedjoker]

This is in your face evidence of the molten steel found at the trade center, debunk this suckers.

[redcapedjoker]

@TimReed22222 nope the report clearly says that beams melted together which were previously not connected. And steel building don't fall down at free fall speed. You can't have something collapse though solid steel that quickly. 9 independent labs all confirmed the presence of termite in the World Trade Center dust. Tim even you don't believe anymore in the official story.

[TimReed22222]

Hey, red, wonder if you've seen this: freerepublic[dot]com/focus/f-n­ews/567417/posts

"The beams, at least six feet high and four feet wide, were BOLTED TOGETHER as part of the original structure ... a silver object melted onto the cross' left side was the remains of a firefighter's jacket ... Firefighters say the fire-resistant jacket turned silver and took on the look and consistency of metal when it encountered extreme heat and fire."